Please this is a two-part question, the man assignment and with the reflection assignment, reflection assignment is just one paragraphs. And most be answer separately. Thank you.
Week 5: Research Summary Assignment
Due Nov 28 by 11:59pm Points 200 Submitting a file upload
Purpose
This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to find and appraise resources related to the PICOT question from Week 2. The focus of this assignment is to evaluate pertinent literature that supports the practice change intervention.
Note: You are to locate original studies with research conducted and published by the primary investigator. You may also use quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods studies, meta-analyses or Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs).
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO1: Integrate evidence-based and research to support advancement of holistic nursing care in diverse healthcare settings. (PO 1,4)
CO2: Integrate knowledge related to evidence-based practice and person-centered care to improve health outcome. (PO 1, 2)
CO4: Develop knowledge related to research and evidence-based practice as a basis for designing and critiquing research studies. (PO 1, 5)
CO5: Analyze research findings and evidence-based practice to advance holistic care initiatives that promote positive healthcare outcomes. (PO 1, 2, 5)
Due Date: Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week 5
Total Points Possible: 200 Points
Requirements
Find and review ten (10) scholarly, peer-reviewed research articles, meta-analyses, or CPGs in support of the practice change intervention. Complete the appropriate section in the worksheet for each article.
State the PICOT question
For each article, supply the information for each of the seven headings for the appropriate article type.
Preparing the Assignment:
Use the designated Research Summary Table Worksheet (Links to an external site.) to supply the required information.
All scholarly, peer-reviewed research articles must be current within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided, and the instructor has approved the use of an older reference.
Use APA 7th edition formatting for references.
Directions and Assignment Criteria
Assignment Criteria
Points
%
Description
PICOT question
20
10%
PICOT question provided in sentence format
Articles 1-10
15/article
150 total
7.5% / article
75% total
For each article:
Scholarly article: US based peer reviewed journal focused for clinicians
Publication date is current within 5 years
Correctly categorizes article type
Completes all seven areas of article analysis
Explains relevance to PICOT question and implications for advanced nursing practice
APA
20
10%
Use of worksheet template
Correct APA 7th edition format for the following:
Font style and size
Citing and referencing sources
Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
Graduate-level writing style
10
5%
Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure
Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing
Synthesis of information is present with no direct quotes
Correct APA 7th edition format for the following:
Font style and size
Title and reference pages
Citing and referencing sources
Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
Use of template
Total
200
100 %
Rubric
NR505NP Week 5 Research Summary Assignment Rubric
NR505NP Week 5 Research Summary Assignment Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePICOT Question
20 pts
Exceptional
PICOT question provided in sentence format and all five attributes are listed. (Six critical elements.)
18 pts
Exceeds
PICOT question provided in sentence format, but one attribute is not defined. (Five critical elements.)
16 pts
Meets
PICOT question provided in sentence format, but two attributes are not defined. (Four critical elements.)
8 pts
Needs Improvement
PICOT question is not in sentence format and/or three or more attributes are not defined.
0 pts
Developing
PICOT question not supplied.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 1
15 pts
Exceptional
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.)
13 pts
Exceeds
Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type.
12 pts
Meets
Presentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type.
6 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements.
0 pts
Developing
Presentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 2
15 pts
Exceptional
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.)
13 pts
Exceeds
Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type.
12 pts
Meets
Presentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type.
6 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements
0 pts
Developing
Presentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 3
15 pts
Exceptional
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.)
13 pts
Exceeds
Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type.
12 pts
Meets
Presentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type.
6 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements.
0 pts
Developing
Presentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 4
15 pts
Exceptional
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.)
13 pts
Exceeds
Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type.
12 pts
Meets
Presentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type.
6 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements.
0 pts
Developing
Presentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 5
15 pts
Exceptional
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.)
13 pts
Exceeds
Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type.
12 pts
Meets
Presentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type.
6 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements
0 pts
Developing
Presentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 6
15 pts
Exceptional
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.)
13 pts
Exceeds
Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type.
12 pts
Meets
Presentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type.
6 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements.
0 pts
Developing
Presentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 7
15 pts
Exceptional
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.)
13 pts
Exceeds
Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type.
12 pts
Meets
Presentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type.
6 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements.
0 pts
Developing
Presentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 8
15 pts
Exceptional
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.)
13 pts
Exceeds
Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type.
12 pts
Meets
Presentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type.
6 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements.
0 pts
Developing
Presentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 9
15 pts
Exceptional
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.)
13 pts
Exceeds
Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type.
12 pts
Meets
Presentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type.
6 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements.
0 pts
Developing
Presentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 10
15 pts
Exceptional
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.)
13 pts
Exceeds
Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type.
12 pts
Meets
Presentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type.
6 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements
0 pts
Developing
Presentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA
20 pts
Exceptional
• Correct APA format with 0-1 error for the following: • Font style and size • Citing and referencing sources • Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
18 pts
Exceeds
• APA format with 2-4 errors for the following: o Font style and size o Citing and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
16 pts
Meets
• APA format with 5-7 errors for the following: o Font style and size o Citing and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
8 pts
Needs Improvement
• APA format with 8-9 errors for the following: o Font style and size o Citing and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
0 pts
Developing
• APA format with > 10 errors for the following: o Font style and size o Citing and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Writing
10 pts
Exceptional
Distinguished graduate-level writing style is evidenced by meeting all of the following criteria with 0-1 errors total: • Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Synthesis of information with no direct quotes • Use of template • Articles from scholarly sources: US based peer-reviewed journals geared for clinicians. (5 critical elements)
9 pts
Exceeds
Graduate-level writing style exceeds expectations as evidenced by 2-4 errors total in the five critical elements.
8 pts
Meets
Proficient graduate-level writing style is evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 5-7 errors total in the five critical elements.
4 pts
Needs Improvement
Graduate-level writing style needs improvement as evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 8-9 errors total in the five critical elements.
0 pts
Developing
Graduate-level writing style needs improvement as evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 10 or more errors total in the five critical elements.
10 pts
Total Points: 200
Week 5: Reflection on Learning
No unread replies.No replies.
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to provide the student an opportunity to reflect on the weekly concepts learned in the course.
Activity Learning Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
CO1: Integrate evidence-based and research to support advancement of holistic nursing care in diverse healthcare settings. (PO 1,4)
CO2: Integrate knowledge related to evidence-based practice and person-centered care to improve health outcome. (PO 1, 2)
CO3: Demonstrate professional and personal growth through a spirit of inquiry, scholarship, and service in diverse healthcare settings. (PO 3, 4)
CO4: Develop knowledge related to research and evidence-based practice as a basis for designing and critiquing research studies. (PO 1, 5)
CO5: Analyze research findings and evidence-based practice to advance holistic care initiatives that promote positive healthcare outcomes. (PO 1, 2, 5)
Total Points Possible: 5
Requirements:
• Reflection: write 1 paragraphs reflecting on your learning for the week. Guiding questions are provided or you may write about what you felt was most significant to you for the week.
Think about the following question related to your review of the literature associated with your PICOT question. You will be revisiting some of these topics in your week 7 presentation.
1. Was it difficult to find evidence related to your selected area of interest?
2. What types of evidence were easiest to find (quantitative, qualitative, reviews, practice guidelines)?
3. How did you find the overall quality of the available evidence?
4. In looking at the available evidence, did you see any gaps in the evidence? What additional research on the topic would you like to see conducted?
5. Based on what you found, does the literature support a practice change?
ASSIGNMENT CONTENT
Category Points % Description
Reflection 5 100% Student provides 1-2 paragraphs reflecting on learning for the week. Reflection may address the guiding questions or may relate to what was most significant to the student for the week.
ASSIGNMENT TOTAL=5 points
For This or a Similar Paper Click Here To Order Now
