Assignment: EBP Project Paper
For this Assignment
Review the following:
Walden paper template.
Submit a 3- to 4-page paper (not including the title page, and reference list) on your EBP project including:
A brief statement of the topic and the PICO clinical question with a purpose statement
Recommended change in practice citing high-level evidence to support your suggested change in practice.
Explain the recommended EB change including the setting, health care consumers affected, and the rationale for the change
Include how the recommended change would be implemented, who will be involved, and how information/change will be provided to those involved, supporting your responses with scholarly literature
Evaluation strategies and outcome measures
Describe how outcomes will be measured and how data will be collected to clearly identify if the plan once implemented has had a positive, negative, or neutral impact, supporting your responses with scholarly literature
Conclude your paper with a summary
Use at least 5 sources of evidence from the following categories: (a) systematic reviews, (b) national clinical guidelines and/or (c) peer-reviewed quantitative / qualitative studies.
Paraphrase, avoid direct quotes, and use your own words supported by evidence to exhibit scholarly writing. Do not use articles older than 5 years unless they have been confirmed as seminal articles by your Instructor. At least 5 sources of evidence are required for your paper.
I didn’t do so well on my 1st paper here is the rubric following that paper that I was graded on:
Nurse Sensitive Indicator0(0.00%)
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 14 (17.50%) – 16 (20.00%)
Provided a Nurse Sensitive Indicator clearly related to the PICO issue.
Proficient 13 (16.25%) – 13 (16.25%)
Provided a Nurse Sensitive Indicator related to the PICO issue.
Basic 11 (13.75%) – 12 (15.00%)
Provided a Nurse Sensitive Indicator minimally related to the PICO issue.
Needs Improvement 0 (0.00%) – 10 (12.50%)
Provided a Nurse Sensitive Indicator with little or no relation to the PICO issue.
Feedback:
This is not one of the NDNQI indicators from the list your were provided.
Population12(15.00%)
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 11 (13.75%) – 12 (15.00%)
Provided a clearly identified well defined patient population related to the PICO issue.
Proficient 10 (12.50%) – 10 (12.50%)
Provided an identified patient population related to the PICO issue.
Basic 8 (10.00%) – 9 (11.25%)
Provided an unclearly identified patient population related to the PICO issue.
Needs Improvement 0 (0.00%) – 7 (8.75%)
Provided an under-developed Identified and/or no identified patient population with little or no relation to the PICO issue.
Intervention12(15.00%)
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 11 (13.75%) – 12 (15.00%)
Provided a well-developed, well defined intervention related to the PICO issue.
Proficient 10 (12.50%) – 10 (12.50%)
Provided a developed defined intervention related to the PICO issue.
Basic 8 (10.00%) – 9 (11.25%)
Provided a minimally developed and defined intervention related to the PICO issue and or the intervention was unclear and minimally developed.
Needs Improvement 0 (0.00%) – 7 (8.75%)
Provided an under-developed intervention or did not identify an intervention with little or no relation to the PICO issue.
Contrast/Compare12(15.00%)
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 11 (13.75%) – 12 (15.00%)
Provided a clear, well-developed contrasting/comparison intervention related to the PICO issue.
Proficient 10 (12.50%) – 10 (12.50%)
Provided a developed contrasting/comparison intervention related to the PICO issue.
Basic 8 (10.00%) – 9 (11.25%)
Provided a minimally developed contrasting/comparison intervention related to the PICO issue.
Needs Improvement 0 (0.00%) – 7 (8.75%)
Provided an under-developed or no contrasting/comparison intervention with little or no relation to the PICO issue.
Outcome12(15.00%)
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 11 (13.75%) – 12 (15.00%)
Provided a clear, well-developed outcome related to the PICO issue.
Proficient 10 (12.50%) – 10 (12.50%)
Provided a developed outcome related to the PICO issue.
Basic 8 (10.00%) – 9 (11.25%)
Provided a minimally developed outcome related to the PICO issue.
Needs Improvement 0 (0.00%) – 7 (8.75%)
Provided an under-developed or did not develop an outcome with little or no relation to the PICO issue.
Answerable Evidence-Based Practice Question In the PICO format and order11.5(14.375%)
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 14 (17.50%) – 16 (20.00%)
Provided a well-developed answerable evidence-based practice question clearly related to the PICO elements.
Proficient 13 (16.25%) – 13 (16.25%)
Provided a developed answerable evidence-based question related to the PICO elements.
Basic 11 (13.75%) – 12 (15.00%)
Provided a minimally developed answerable evidence-based question minimally related to the PICO issue.
Needs Improvement 0 (0.00%) – 10 (12.50%)
Provided under-developed or did not provide an answerable evidence-based question with little or no relation to the PICO elements.
Feedback:
How is not the answer we want from a PICO question. We want to know yes or no, does the intervention work.
For This or a Similar Paper Click Here To Order Now
