Please see the attached literature review and compete the following:
“Remove the reference lists from the running text, but keep the summaries and include comparative details on how the sources relate under each of the main themes that came up from those sources”
Watch this video. Links to an external site. that discusses the idea of the Declaration of
Human Rights.
Then, compare and contrast the civil rights and human rights approaches to advocating
for racial justice. Which approach do you believe holds the greatest potential of
eradicating racial inequality? Why? How do other systems of oppression like capitalism
and patriarchy play a role in limiting basic human rights? Use the knowledge you have
gained over the semester to craft your response.
As Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology advances rapidly, it promises to radically transform many areas of human life, including healthcare, education, science, and warfare. With respect to the latter, in particular, some governments and private companies around the world are currently working on developing Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (LAWS).
A United States’ Department of Defense Directive defines a fully autonomous weapon system as “a weapon that, once activated, can select and engage targets without further intervention by a human operator. This includes human-supervised autonomous weapon systems that are designed to allow human operators to override operation of the weapon system, but can select and engage in targets without further human input after activation” (Department of Defense Directive 3000.09, 2012).
video:
https://www.nytimes.com/video/players/offsite/inde…
In a message to the Group of Governmental Experts Links to an external site.(GGE) of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW), the United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said that “autonomous machines with the power and discretion to take lives without human involvement are politically unacceptable, morally repugnant, and should be prohibited by international law.” The United Nations convened the GGE group in an attempt to create an international forum for open discussions on LAWS. However, as various nations hold opposing views about LAWS, very little progress has been made since talks started in 2017.
For example, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States oppose a ban on the development of LAWS. In UN talks, all three nations have argued that LAWS can have benefits and that a preemptive ban is not necessary. Moreover, Russia and the US have questioned the relevance of international humanitarian law to LAWS, while the UK and US have also argued that existing national weapon reviews are the best way to deal with LAWS. In doing so, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States have been undermining the UN’s attempt to foster international cooperation on the issue of LAWS.
As UN talks on LAWS stagnate, the private sector must play a critical role in this debate, since private companies are often the ones that actually develop LAWS. The Campaign to Stop Killer Robots Links to an external site.is the largest coalition of non-governmental organizations that is attempting to ban LAWS. The campaign released a viral video titled Slaughterbots, a term coined by Stuart Russell, a Professor of Computer Science at UC Berkeley, which portrays a future where automated drones kill innocent civilian groups under the order of an unknown operator. Professor Russell envisions a dystopian future in which swarms of slaughter-bots are instructed to attack technologically inferior enemies. Equipped with face recognition technology, these killer drones can target specific individuals. The advantage of LAWS is that the attacker’s soldiers will never be exposed to any risk. Wars can be fought by people working in offices thousands of miles away from the target.
However, terrorist and criminal organizations may also be tempted to use LAWS. If one can kill one’s enemies by using small flying robots equipped with face recognition technology, anyone can become a mass murder at any time. If the slaughter-bots are mass produced, they could wipe out entire cities without destroying buildings and other values assets.
Please answer the following questions about the case:
What are the morally relevant facts of the case? What happened (or will happen)? Why did it happen (or will happen)? Who made (or will make) the key decision(s)? Who was (or will be) affected? What are (or will be) the long-term consequences?
What is the most important moral issue raised by the case? Try to formulate the moral question in a single sentence.
Define the key terms of the case and clarify any unresolved conceptual issues. (For example, does the technology pose an existential threat to humanity?)
Apply the relevant code(s) of ethics (namely, the NSPE, IEEE, and ACM Codes of Ethics). Do the code(s) issue clear and coherent verdicts? If not, why not?
How robust is the moral verdict issued by the code(s)? Check this by applying the ethical theories discussed in chapters 5 and 6 (specifically, Act-/Rule-utilitarianism, Duty Ethics, Virtue Ethics, and Rights Ethics). Do all ethical theories yield the same verdict? If not, develop a strategy for managing this moral uncertainty.
– if you can please formulate a moral conclusion about the case from a particular ethical perspective (i.e., Act-/Rule-utilitarianism, Duty Ethics, Virtue Ethics, or Rights Ethics),
————————————————————–
Attached is the book for reference
Please only use the book, videos, and the links as sources if you want outside sources you can use the internet but don’t cite from another books.
I have also attached the answers from a prevoius case study you worked on, follow the same format.
BACKGROUND
Utilitarianism uplifts ‘the greatest happiness principle’ and asks us to measure the consequences of our actions above all else. But then the next question arrives, who and what counts as consequential, especially as we consider large-scale problems such as climate injustice? In one of this week’s readings, philosopher Kyle Whyte reflects on the stories we tell ourselves to make sense of place in this world:
Is there a succinct way to convey an Indigenous perspective on climate justice that makes all these connections? Perhaps a story of vessels can be created to describe Indigenous climate justice. Stories of vessels, such as ships, canoes and boats, are often created to describe the relationships among different societies who share land, water and air. Buckminster Fuller’s “spaceship earth” flies through space without the possibility of getting more fuel and supplies, illustrating dependence on finite resources (Fuller, 2008). Garrett Hardin described rich countries as lifeboats surrounded by poor people swimming in the surrounding oceans – there is only so much room on the lifeboat for poor people as environmental and economic conditions deteriorate (Hardin, 1974). Martin Luther King, Jr., in an attempt to motivate respect for diversity and justice in the U.S., said the widely quoted phrase “We may have come to these shores on different ships, but we are now all in the same boat” (3).
Instead of the spaceship or lifeboat, Whyte offers an allegory featuring canoes, aircraft carriers, and hovercrafts; “[t]he pool of waters and sky are the earth system at broad and local scales.” For him (and Hoover), the earth system is not destined to be rendered a wasteland (the tragedy of the commons) because of humanity’s unchecked greed–the earth system is abundant, and human cultures are adaptive. The real problem has to do with the design of the aircraft carriers and hovercrafts.
Ask yourself as you read, are we adrift on a lifeboat and doomed to violence, hoarding, and gorging as we fight for survival? Or are other stories possible?
MATERIALS
Garrett Hardin, Lifeboat Ethics: the Case Against Helping the Poor. Limited time? Read these sections: the introduction, Adrift in a Moral Sea, Multiplying the Rich and the Poor, Population Control the Crude Way, Overloading the Environment.
Kyle Powys Whyte, Way Beyond the Lifeboat,
The biggest priority for your reading: Protecting Our Living Relatives: Environmental Reproductive Justice and Seed Rematriation
Key concepts: lifeboat ethics, the tragedy of the commons (see Elinor Ostrom for critique), anthropogenic (human-caused), living relatives/other-than-human, climate injustice, collective continuance, eradication and assimilation, reproductive justice, environmental justice, seed sovereignty, repatriation, traditional foodways
PROMPT
Choose 2-3 quotes from our readings that were most thought-provoking for you and explain why.
Readings:
Garrett Hardin, Lifeboat Ethics: the Case Against Helping the Poor. Limited time? Read these sections: the introduction, Adrift in a Moral Sea, Multiplying the Rich and the Poor, Population Control the Crude Way, and Overloading the Environment.
Kyle Powys Whyte, Way Beyond the Lifeboat,
The biggest priority for your reading: Protecting Our Living Relatives: Environmental Reproductive Justice and Seed Rematriation
Please write the answer in VERY SIMPLE LANGUAGE.
No plagiarism should be found.
Please let me know which quotes you choose.
Please take your time to go over all the articles provided and write the answer accordingly.
internship site: child day care and aftercare program
Capstone topic: children at risk of abuse or neglect
150 words
Internship Prompt:
What personal or professional qualities have you observed that would make someone successful in the Human Services field?
Capstone Prompt:
Pilot test your data collection instrument on our class by uploading your instrument and giving feedback to your classmates on their instruments.
Watch this video. Links to an external site. that discusses the idea of the Declaration of
Human Rights.
Then, compare and contrast the civil rights and human rights approaches to advocating
for racial justice. Which approach do you believe holds the greatest potential of
eradicating racial inequality? Why? How do other systems of oppression like capitalism
and patriarchy play a role in limiting basic human rights? Use the knowledge you have
gained over the semester to craft your response.
