Please see rubric of final and use my thesis to do my research proposal.
Please see rubric of Final and use my thesis to do my research proposal. PUBLIC RELATIONS ARTICLE ONLY!!!!
Body paragraph – argument #1 – quote #3
A works cited page or just a link to the sites used. I’m taking the side that the United States government should impose an extra health tax.
Structure:
1.) Intro paragraph with hook and thesis – answers the research question with 3 arguments/reasons
2.) Body paragraph – argument #1 – quote #1
3.) Body paragraph – argument #1 – quote #2
4.) Body paragraph – argument #1 – quote #3
5.) Body paragraph – argument #2 – quote #4
6.) Body paragraph – argument #2 – quote #5
7.) Body paragraph – argument #2 – quote #6
8.) Body paragraph – argument #3 – quote #7
9.) Body paragraph – argument #3 – quote #8
10.) Body paragraph – argument #3 – quote #9
11.) Conclusion paragraph – answer question “so what?” – restate thesis
What can be done to address and stop the issue.
This discussion board will relate to a women’s issue story that you retrieved from a media source (newspaper, TV, radio, etc.).
You may not use Immaculee Illibagiza or the Rwanda genocide for this discussion board. It must be an international story.
Do not select a story about something that happened here in the US.
An international social welfare issue regarding women must be addressed. The issue should be one that was discussed in your text, in the video you watched and/or the material you read in the pdf file.
You must attach a link to the story (this is required). Your story should be current, that is, not more than two months old.
You must provide answers to the following questions/topics:
1. A brief summary of the story/issue
2. What women’s social welfare issue is presented
3. Why do you believe the issue exists and why was it was able to occur
4. What can be done to address and stop the issue.
Your discussion board will be graded on conscientiousness, clarity, analysis and insights.
Your original Discussion Board Thread should be 350-400 words. You will also respond to 2 other classmates’ Threads. Your responses/comments should be between 150-300 words. You will not be able to view others’ Threads until you have entered your own. To be graded, both your original and two responses must be submitted. Submissions that don’t meet these requirements will result in a grade of 0. There is no partial credit if you do not post an original and two responses to classmates’ posts.
My thesis proposal
Please see my professors commment PLEASE USE PUBLIC RELATIONS PAPERS ONLY… I ALSO UPLOADED
MY THESIS PROPOSAL
Double-spaced throughout, with the exception of the references, and quotations of more than four lines or two or more sentences.
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to develop and submit the ILE Program Plan paper Introduction (and Title Page).
Course Outcomes
This assignment provides documentation of student ability to meet the following MPH610 course outcomes:
CO2: Demonstrate application and synthesis of MPH foundational and concentration competencies.
Due Date
Submit your completed assignment by Saturday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of Week 8 as directed.
Requirements
The ILE Program Plan Background and Introduction assignment will be graded on quality of self-assessment, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria/rubric. This assignment is worth 350 points.
Create your assignment using Microsoft Word, which is the required format for all Chamberlain College of Health Professions documents.
Follow the directions and grading criteria closely. Any questions about this paper may be posted under the Q & A Forum.
There are no requirements for page length on this assignment.
APA format is required with both a title page and reference page (no abstract is required). Use the required components of the review as Level 1 headers (upper and lower case, centered).
Note: Introduction – Write an introduction but do not use “Introduction” as a heading in accordance with the rules put forth in the latest edition of the Publication manual of the American Psychological Association.
Guidelines for the ILE Program Plan Background and Introduction (include title page)
A program plan is a written report that will follow standard scientific format. Each student will select a public health scenario Links to an external site. from the list provided. There is no page limit and the goal is to adequately describe certain aspects of the program listed below and demonstrate the student’s attainment of the selected MPH concentration competencies (found on the course Syllabus). Each student will select at least 4 competencies to demonstrate.
General Guidelines
Page numbering
Centered below bottom margin
Font
Times New Roman 12 point is recommended.
Spacing
Double-spaced throughout, with the exception of the references, and quotations of more than four lines or two or more sentences.
Content Guidelines
Title Page
Name of the University
Name of the College
Name of the Program
Title of the program plan
Student’s name
Acknowledgments
See NOTE below
Abstract
See NOTE below
Background and Introduction
General introduction and description of the public health topic
Include relevant statistics
Include a description of the target population
Overview of proposed public health program
Description of selected competencies
Theoretical framework
***PLEASE NOTE: This assignment is for the Title Page and for the Background and Introduction portions of your Program Plan. You may leave a titled blank page for Acknowledgements, following the Title Page and a titled blank page for the Abstract, following the acknowledgements and before the Introduction. You will complete these blank pages upon submission of the completed Program Plan in MPH620.
Please refer to the MPH Big Picture: APE & ILE Links to an external site. page (in the Getting Started module of this course) for more information about the program plan you will be completing. Follow your assignment directions closely as each assignment is only a portion of the larger program plan.
Why now?
**please don’t just agree to post but add more to their post that can be discussed ***
Classmate 1:Hedda: Imagine you are in an elevator with an important funder that wants to fund your public health research. What kind of research do you want to conduct to learn more about your public health issue? Share your elevator speech for a public health topic that you are passionate about and share why it is so important to address this public health issue. Feel free to use first person in your response. Here is my answer below:
I am so pleased that you have expressed interest in funding my research on non-medical exemptions from school immunization requirements. I would like to conduct mixed method research ( that is both qualitative and quantitative research) to take a deep dive into the resurgence of measles in school-aged children. I know that your time is a premium so I wanted to briefly outline how I plan to approach this critical public health issue.
This is the Problem: Non-medical exemptions from school immunization requirements
Why is it important? It is important because of the resurgence of measles which is highly contagious. Non –medical exemptions have been shown to contribute to the the resurgence (Nimblett-Clarke, 2021)
Why now? With the issue of vaccine hesitancy and public distrust in vaccines, this may result in an even greater increase of the hesitancy to have school –aged children vaccinated.
Who is impacted and who cares? Children and their health as well as the health of their peers, school administrators, public health officials and the wider community would be impacted and would be interested in any recrudescence of communicable diseases which were previously eradicated. The impact of measles on unvaccinated children is devastating.
In essence, it is the policy makers who influence the laws that impact children, their families and their schools and with my research in our state, it is important that they see the data supporting the need for vaccination and the experiences of Texas and California. They also need to see the difference in policies in turn influences difference in outcomes.
I’d be happy to set up a time to discuss further and answer any questions you may have.
References:
Han, G., Batra, N., Vallejo, A., Schechter, R., Zipprich, J., & Harriman, K. (2019). Notes from the Field: Measles Outbreak in an Era of Stricter Immunization Requirements – California, March 2018. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 68(8), 201–202. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6808a3 Links to an external site.
Hotez P. J. (2016). Texas and Its Measles Epidemics. PLoS medicine, 13(10), e1002153. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002153 Links to an external site.
National Conference of State Legislators (Nd), States With Religious and Philosophical Exemptions From School Immunization Requirements, Retrieved from https://www.ncsl.org/research/health/school-immunization-exemption-state-laws.aspx Links to an external site.
Nimblett-Clarke A. (2021). The role of vaccine exemptions in the resurgence of measles. JAAPA : official journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants, 34(2), 36–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JAA.0000731512.09853.af
Classmate2: Jessica: The American Cancer Society estimated that in 2022 there will be about 268,490 new cases of prostate cancer and 34,500 deaths from prostate cancer in the United States. With about 1 out of 8 men being diagnosed with prostate cancer in their lifetime, it is important that we educate men on the risk factors and ensure they come in for early screening. I stress to everyone that prostate cancer although it may be the second leading cause of death in American men, it is one that can be prevented with timely screening. If we were able to catch more of these cases of prostate cancer at an earlier stage, we can work to decrease the mortality by initiating treatment before the cancer spreads.
There are three main risk factors for prostate cancer: age, race, and family history. According to the American Cancer Society, 6 out of 10 prostate cancer cases are diagnosed after the age of 65 and it is more likely to develop in non-Hispanic Black men. At the Chicago Prostate Foundation our goal is to further promote public awareness, prevention, detection, and treatment for prostate cancer. I appreciate your interest in our organization and can assure you that your funding will help us expand our current research. We are currently working on a project that takes a closer look at prostate cancer screening and diagnosis amongst union workers including firefighters and policemen. Through our work at the foundation we have found that this subgroup of men have been associated with late diagnosis of prostate cancer with an associated poor prognosis. Our research that is underway focuses on revealing the barriers that keep these men from early screening. Once these are identified we intend to use this information to create a public health program that focuses on increasing education and awareness amongst union workers.
References:
American Cancer Society. (n.d.). Key statistics for prostate cancer: Prostate cancer facts. American Cancer Society. Retrieved November 15, 2022, from https://www.cancer.org/cancer/prostate-cancer/about/key-statistics.html
American Cancer Society. (n.d.). Prostate cancer risk factors. American Cancer Society. Retrieved November 15, 2022, from https://www.cancer.org/cancer/prostate-cancer/causes-risks-prevention/risk-factors.html
Mission. Prostate Cancer Foundation of Chicago. (2022, June 29). Retrieved November 15, 2022, from https://chicagoprostatefoundation.org/about-the-pcfc/mission/
