Apa refernce

Learning Goal: I’m working on a speech therapy spreadsheet and need a sample draft to help me learn.
Write sentences to describe yourself.
In this assignment, you are going to write about your personality, appearance and interests.
2-
Discussion Topic
Why is it important to learn basic information about diseases for public health students?
APA REFERNCE
PLEEASE 0 PLAGRASSIM

Apa refernce

Learning Goal: I’m working on a speech therapy spreadsheet and need a sample draft to help me learn.
Write sentences to describe yourself.
In this assignment, you are going to write about your personality, appearance and interests.
2-
Discussion Topic
Why is it important to learn basic information about diseases for public health students?
APA REFERNCE
PLEEASE 0 PLAGRASSIM

Learning Goal: I’m working on a speech therapy multi-part question and need an e

Learning Goal: I’m working on a speech therapy multi-part question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
For the first learning activity, you’ll be focusing on one part of Evidence-Based Practice: examining external evidence. You’ll do this by selecting a research article to read and analyze. (I suggest choosing one that aligns with your group project!) Reading research can feel overwhelming, but the best way to approach it is knowing that there will be some things you’ll understand and some things you won’t. (This is the case for me too!) The important thing is to determine the article’s main points and if they’re supported by the research design and results of the study. Don’t get too bogged down in the details. I’ve posted some Readings that can give you some ways to approach reading an article. I’d suggest trying to find an article that’s a randomized controlled trial (RCT) if you can.
After reading your article, submit the Article Analysis Worksheet.docx
to earn credit for this assignment. (There’s one bonus point available!)
(use this website to do the research and search about Autism )
https://speechbite.com/ (Links to an external site.)
Rubric
LA1
LA1
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA CitationProvide the article citation using standard APA format.
5 ptsFull Marks
0 ptsNo Marks
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePurpose2 questions: 2 points each
4 ptsFull Marks
0 ptsNo Marks
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMethods3 questions: 2 points each
6 ptsFull Marks
0 ptsNo Marks
6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResults3 questions: 2 points each
6 ptsFull Marks
0 ptsNo Marks
6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGeneral2 questions: 2 points each
4 ptsFull Marks
0 ptsNo Marks
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar/Spelling5 points: 0-1 error
4 points: 2 errors
3 points: 3 errors
2 points: 4 errors
1 point: 5 errors
0= more than 5 errors
5 ptsFull Marks
0 ptsNo Marks
5 pts
Total Points: 30

Learning Goal: I’m working on a speech therapy report and need an explanation an

Learning Goal: I’m working on a speech therapy report and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
After reading the chapter on disability models and watching Dr. Barnes’ presentation, write and submit a 2-3 page reflection
that addresses the following 3 ideas:
Based on what you’ve read and thought about, how would you describe the concept of “disability?” In what ways do you agree/disagree with some of the scholars’ definitions?
How have you seen the various models of disability reflected in our society? What are your thoughts and/or reactions to this?
How could models of disability affect our work in speech and hearing science?
Details: double-spaced, readable font, 11-12 font size, use APA style for intext citation and citation
See the grading rubric below for more details.
Rubric
Reflection Paper
Reflection Paper
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection
15 to >10.0 ptsProficient
Shows strong evidence of reasoned reflection and depth.
10 to >5.0 ptsCompetent
Shows evidence of reasoned reflection.
5 to >0 ptsNovice
Lacks reflection and depth.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
5 to >3.0 ptsProficient
Well-organized, well written, easy to read and understand.
3 to >2.0 ptsCompetent
Contains attempts at organization that could be improved.
2 to >0 ptsNovice
Organization lacking and arguments difficult or impossible to follow
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCompleteness
5 to >3.0 ptsProficient
Addresses all elements contained within the stated objective(s) or questions for the assignment
3 to >2.0 ptsCompetent
Addresses most of the elements contained within the stated objective(s) or questions for the assignment.
2 to >0 ptsNovice
Addresses less than half of the elements contained within the stated objective(s) or questions for the assignment.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpelling & Grammar
5 to >4.0 ptsProficient
0-2 errors
4 to >2.0 ptsCompetent
3-4 errors
2 to >0 ptsNovice
5+ errors
5 pts
Total Points: 30

Learning Goal: I’m working on a speech therapy report and need an explanation an

Learning Goal: I’m working on a speech therapy report and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
After reading the chapter on disability models and watching Dr. Barnes’ presentation, write and submit a 2-3 page reflection
that addresses the following 3 ideas:
Based on what you’ve read and thought about, how would you describe the concept of “disability?” In what ways do you agree/disagree with some of the scholars’ definitions?
How have you seen the various models of disability reflected in our society? What are your thoughts and/or reactions to this?
How could models of disability affect our work in speech and hearing science?
Details: double-spaced, readable font, 11-12 font size, use APA style for intext citation and citation
See the grading rubric below for more details.
Rubric
Reflection Paper
Reflection Paper
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection
15 to >10.0 ptsProficient
Shows strong evidence of reasoned reflection and depth.
10 to >5.0 ptsCompetent
Shows evidence of reasoned reflection.
5 to >0 ptsNovice
Lacks reflection and depth.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
5 to >3.0 ptsProficient
Well-organized, well written, easy to read and understand.
3 to >2.0 ptsCompetent
Contains attempts at organization that could be improved.
2 to >0 ptsNovice
Organization lacking and arguments difficult or impossible to follow
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCompleteness
5 to >3.0 ptsProficient
Addresses all elements contained within the stated objective(s) or questions for the assignment
3 to >2.0 ptsCompetent
Addresses most of the elements contained within the stated objective(s) or questions for the assignment.
2 to >0 ptsNovice
Addresses less than half of the elements contained within the stated objective(s) or questions for the assignment.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpelling & Grammar
5 to >4.0 ptsProficient
0-2 errors
4 to >2.0 ptsCompetent
3-4 errors
2 to >0 ptsNovice
5+ errors
5 pts
Total Points: 30

Learning Goal: I’m working on a speech therapy report and need an explanation an

Learning Goal: I’m working on a speech therapy report and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
After reading the chapter on disability models and watching Dr. Barnes’ presentation, write and submit a 2-3 page reflection
that addresses the following 3 ideas:
Based on what you’ve read and thought about, how would you describe the concept of “disability?” In what ways do you agree/disagree with some of the scholars’ definitions?
How have you seen the various models of disability reflected in our society? What are your thoughts and/or reactions to this?
How could models of disability affect our work in speech and hearing science?
Details: double-spaced, readable font, 11-12 font size, use APA style for intext citation and citation
See the grading rubric below for more details.
Rubric
Reflection Paper
Reflection Paper
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection
15 to >10.0 ptsProficient
Shows strong evidence of reasoned reflection and depth.
10 to >5.0 ptsCompetent
Shows evidence of reasoned reflection.
5 to >0 ptsNovice
Lacks reflection and depth.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
5 to >3.0 ptsProficient
Well-organized, well written, easy to read and understand.
3 to >2.0 ptsCompetent
Contains attempts at organization that could be improved.
2 to >0 ptsNovice
Organization lacking and arguments difficult or impossible to follow
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCompleteness
5 to >3.0 ptsProficient
Addresses all elements contained within the stated objective(s) or questions for the assignment
3 to >2.0 ptsCompetent
Addresses most of the elements contained within the stated objective(s) or questions for the assignment.
2 to >0 ptsNovice
Addresses less than half of the elements contained within the stated objective(s) or questions for the assignment.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpelling & Grammar
5 to >4.0 ptsProficient
0-2 errors
4 to >2.0 ptsCompetent
3-4 errors
2 to >0 ptsNovice
5+ errors
5 pts
Total Points: 30