Your essay will need to use at least six out of the eight following documents: D

Your essay will need to use at least six out of the eight following documents:
Document #1:
Document #1: The Bill of Rights (1791)
Document #2:
“During the contest of opinion through which we have passed the animation of discussions and of exertions has sometimes worn an aspect which might impose on strangers unused to think freely and to speak and to write what they think; but this being now decided by the voice of the nation, announced according to the rules of the Constitution, all will, of course, arrange themselves under the will of the law, and unite in common efforts for the common good. All, too, will bear in mind this sacred principle, that though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, that will to be rightful must be reasonable; that the minority possess their equal rights, which equal law must protect, and to violate would be oppression. Let us, then, fellow-citizens, unite with one heart and one mind. Let us restore to social intercourse that harmony and affection without which liberty and even life itself are but dreary things. And let us reflect that, having banished from our land that religious intolerance under which mankind so long bled and suffered, we have yet gained little if we countenance a political intolerance as despotic, as wicked, and capable of as bitter and bloody persecutions. During the throes and convulsions of the ancient world, during the agonizing spasms of infuriated man, seeking through blood and slaughter his long-lost liberty, it was not wonderful that the agitation of the billows should reach even this distant and peaceful shore; that this should be more felt and feared by some and less by others, and should divide opinions as to measures of safety. But every difference of opinion is not a difference of principle. We have called by different names brethren of the same principle. We are all Republicans, we are all Federalists. If there be any among us who would wish to dissolve this Union or to change its republican form, let them stand undisturbed as monuments of the safety with which error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it. I know, indeed, that some honest men fear that a republican government can not be strong, that this Government is not strong enough; but would the honest patriot, in the full tide of successful experiment, abandon a government which has so far kept us free and firm on the theoretic and visionary fear that this Government, the world’s best hope, may by possibility want energy to preserve itself? I trust not. I believe this, on the contrary, the strongest Government on earth. I believe it the only one where every man, at the call of the law, would fly to the standard of the law, and would meet invasions of the public order as his own personal concern. Sometimes it is said that man can not be trusted with the government of himself. Can he, then, be trusted with the government of others? Or have we found angels in the forms of kings to govern him? Let history answer this question.”
Document #2: Thomas Jefferson’s First Inaugural Address (1800)
Document #3:
Document #3: portrait of Alexander Hamilton
Document #4
Document #4: The Trail of Tears painted by Robert Lindneux in 1942
Document #5
Document #5: “General Jackson Slaying the Many-Headed Monster” (1836) (Links to an external site.)
Document #6
Document #6: Map of America in 1850
Document #7
“A free negro of the African race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a “citizen” within the meaning of the Constitution of the United States. . . .
The only two clauses in the Constitution which point to this race treat them as persons whom it was morally lawfully to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. . . .
Every citizen has a right to take with him into the Territory any article of property which the Constitution of the United States recognises as property. . . .
The Constitution of the United States recognises slaves as property, and pledges the Federal Government to protect it. And Congress cannot exercise any more authority over property of that description than it may constitutionally exercise over property of any other kind. . . .
Prohibiting a citizen of the United States from taking with him his slaves when he removes to the Territory . . . is an exercise of authority over private property which is not warranted by the Constitution, and the removal of the plaintiff [Dred Scott] by his owner to that Territory gave
him no title to freedom.”
Document #7: Roger Taney on Dred Scott v Sandford (1857)
Document #8:
Document #8: Map of 1860 Election
Your grade (250 points) for this assignment will be based on the following criteria:
Thesis: Present a thesis that makes a historically defensible claim and response to all parts of the question. Your thesis must consist of one or more sentences located in the introduction.
Argument Development: Develop and support a cohesive argument that recognizes and accounts for the historical complexity by explicitly illustrating relationships among historical evidence such as contradictions, corroboration, and/or qualification.
Use of Documents: Utilize the content of at least six documents to support the stated thesis or a relevant argument. For every document below the minimum quota of six documents, 30 points will be deducted from your total score.
Sourcing the documents: Explaining the significance of the author’s point of view, author’s purpose, historical context, and/or audience for at least six documents.
Contextualization: Situate the argument by explaining the broader historical events, developments, or processes immediately relevant to the question.
Go Beyond the Visuals of the Documents: This is a history test and not an eye exam so don’t repeat info that is already provided to you in the document or redescribe what the eyes can see. Provide examples or additional historical evidence (key terms/concepts from the reading and online lectures) related to the documents to support your argument
Be Creative with Your Organization/Do not provide a list of document summaries: Do not use the document # as the topic sentence of your body paragraphs for doing so will make your submission looks more like an itemized list of document summaries. Instead, your topic sentence should highlight/preview a historical theme/idea that your paragraph will discuss. Use the documents as evidence to validate/support the themes you are trying to highlight to answer the essay prompt
Proofread Your Essay Before Submission: if there is extra time left before the submission deadline, you should use it to proofread your essay and rearrange your writing to make sure it is organized and presented in a manner that the reader can follow and comprehend.
Citation: A work cited list is not needed because all of your content should be based on lectures and assigned readings only. A simple (Doc #) citation at the end of the sentence in which you discussed the document is sufficient.
[Double Check Your Submission] double-check your submission to make sure it meets all of the criteria for the assignment.
[Proofread] Please proofread your essay utilizes at least six documents to answer the essay prompt in a clear, organized, detailed, and cohesive essay format (short essay response includes a short introduction including a thesis statement, body paragraphs with supporting evidence, and conclusion statement)
[At least 1000 words] Your submission must be at least 1000 words and include specific details, key terms, and contents from class readings and lectures. Any submission with fewer than 1000 words will automatically receive a zero
[Include citations of at least six documents] When quoting or citing from the document, a simple in writing MLA citation (source #) at the end of the sentence is sufficient. Any essay that does not include a citation of assigned documents, discuss relevant information/content/key terms beyond the documents and written vaguely and broadly will not receive partial credit
[Follow instructions] This is simple. Read the instructions and follow them very carefully. Failure to follow the instructions will lead to no credit for this assignment regardless of submission.

Write your introduction. Write your introduction. Be sure to incorporate your ba

Write your introduction.
Write your introduction. Be sure to incorporate your background information and to conclude with your thesis statement.
Based on your primary and secondary source research, turn your research question into a thesis statement that addresses your topic and how it
has been influenced by its historical context.
Use primary and secondary sources that address the historical context of your topics to respond to the following critical elements. Be sure to cite your information using the most recent version of APA guidelines. Based on the sources you have selected, address the following questions:
Summarize the topic using primary and secondary sources. In other words, what was going on in the world/area/society around the event?
Discuss how the historical context impacted the topic. For instance, what was happening in the world/area/society around the event that
impacted how it occurred?

T‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍he iconic status of many civil rights leaders of the past o

T‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍he iconic status of many civil rights leaders of the past often overshadows the myriad people who struggled, suffered and sometimes died in the movement. Your assignment is to research and locate and little know civil rights leader from the US decades of 1950-1970. Do not make this a biography, but rather, focus on their role and impact. You may write about someone that was part of the political process or a victim whose injuries caused a ripple effect in the movement to eqality. You may focus on someone of any race a‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍s long as there is evidence of their part in the civil rights period. You may not use common people like Dr. King, Malcolm X, Ruby Bridges, or any other well known person. Format Requirements 750-1,000 words Turabian format 12 font times new roman Include a cover page Bibliography & footnotes must be included are paper will not be graded Content Requirements Online resources allowed but MUST be cited MUST have a primary source from a newspaper archive The Person Being Wrote about is A. Phillip Randolp‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍h

The goal of this assignment is to analyze the ethical and practical consideratio

The goal of this assignment is to analyze the ethical and practical considerations facing President Gerald Ford as he made the decision to pardon former president Richard Nixon of any crimes that may have occurred in context of the Watergate scandal that forced Nixon to resign.
After reading the article and watching the videos posted with this assignment please respond to the following:
Please explain the reasons Gerald Ford gave for pardoning former President Richard Nixon. How would you describe the ethical issues President Ford faced as he weighed this decision? What were his choices? Please identify which of those choices was the most ethical decision and explain why you believe it was the most ethical option. Is that the choice he made? If not, why do you think he made a different choice? What other approach do you think he could have taken in regard to former President Nixon? And finally, what were the possible consequences that President Ford faced by making his decision? What were the actual consequences that resulted from his decision to pardon the former president?
Sources
article
The Pardon | History | Smithsonian Magazine
Video link
Bob Woodward: Why Ford Pardoned Nixon – YouTube
Ford Pardons Nixon – 1974 | Today in History | 8 Sept 16 – YouTube

Book Review/Essay, “Finding Manana” By Mirta Ojito Your second writing assignmen

Book Review/Essay, “Finding Manana” By Mirta Ojito
Your second writing assignment is a 6-8 page book review/report of
“Finding Manana” by Mirta Ojito. Ojito was a young woman who left Cuba
with her family during the Mariel boatlift in 1980 and came to the U.S.,
where she learned English, attended FAU, and ended up becoming a
Pulitzer-prize winning journalist (at the Miami Herald) so she has a certain
amount in common with you. Goal:
1. Read the entire book
2. Give a brief summary of it and
3. Write a response/reaction to it, placing some of what you write
in historical context.
Questions to guide you:
 From a historical perspective: what is the background history of
Cuba? Who was Fidel Castro? What was the Mariel Boatlift?
What impact did it have on American public life and foreign
policy, and what impact did it have, if any, on American policies
2
toward immigrants? (This you can look up in the fau.edu library
databases; please cite the URL of your sources in parentheses)
 About the book itself: how do you feel about it? Are there parts
of it that you especially like or dislike, or parts that speak to you
in a particularly strong way, or places where you feel a
particular empathy for Mirta? What were you surprised or struck
by? How could you compare you own life experience to Mirta’s?
 Details of the book: What are your impressions of the
descriptions she gives of life in Cuba as opposed to life in the
U.S.? Why do you think her family wanted so badly to leave?
What do you learn about the way the Cuban system works from
the book and your background reading, and how do you think it
affects the population there, especially young people? What
might some say are the good points of the Cuban system of
life? What did Fidel Castro do during this period that sent more
immigrants to the U.S.? Why were they willing to go through
such an experience to leave the country?
 About Mirta: In what way is she conflicted in her feelings?
(loving her native land and wanting to stay vs. wanting to leave;
conflicts with her parents; conflicts with what she is taught in
school, etc.). What do you think of the way she writes about her
family and her relationship with them? What does she write
about her feelings concerning the United States?
3
Your paper should be double-spaced with one-inch margins. Please put
your name, date, and the name of the class on the first page and your last
name and the page number on the rest of the pages. If you refer to
sources, please cite them in parentheses and include a “works cited”
section.
Link to order the book on Amazon if you don’t have it already:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-
listing/0143036602/ref=tmm_pap_used_olp_sr?ie=UTF8&condition=used&
qid=1585020704&sr=8-1 (Links to an external site.)