I’ve posted 3 topics Each response must be a small paragraph topic 1: 5 ways to

I’ve posted 3 topics Each response must be a small paragraph topic 1: 5 ways to avoid being fooled by statistics. Read this article. Comment. https://www.iacquire.com/blog/5-ways-to-avoid-being-fooled-by-statistics topic 2: purious Correlations: Take a look at this website. Comment. https://www.tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations topic 3: Meet Yoshitaka fujii, the most prolific fraudster in modern science https://www.vox.com/2015/5/21/8636569/retraction-yoshitaka-fujii

In the scenario assignments, you are asked to reflect on responses to the presen

In the scenario assignments, you are asked to reflect on responses to the presented scenario. It should not just be writing down your first reaction or what you already know. Reflection involves critical thinking, which means rethinking your existing knowledge and previously held opinions in light of what we have learned about theories of ethics, logic, and reasoning. You will need to question your current knowledge and beliefs. Discuss the main points of the debate, what stance you take, support that stance, and discuss the opposing argument. Also discuss an ethical theory that would apply to defend your view. To complete each scenario assignment: Complete the entire scenario. Compose your reflection in a Word document and be sure to address, at a minimum, the following questions: Why do you feel the way you do about the issue presented? Of the four responses offered in the scenario, which do you think is the most ethical and why? Support your conclusions with evidence and specific examples from the textbook, including a minimum of one theory of ethics to defend your stance. Your reflection must be 1-2 pages in length and follow APA formatting and citation guidelines as appropriate, making sure to cite at least two sources. Review the rubric for specific grading criteria.

After reading and reflecting upon the article, “Prison Architecture and Inmate M

After reading and reflecting upon the article, “Prison Architecture and Inmate Misconduct,” which perspective do you believe provides the best explanation of inmate misconduct: the deprivation perspective, the importation perspective, or the situational perspective? Be sure to explain why and fully elaborate. And, based upon what you have read so far in this class, which type of prison architecture do you believe would be the best in deterring staff-inmate inappropriate relationships? Elaborate. Next, as you may know, very few states offer conjugal visits between inmates and their intimate partners. Based upon the readings for Week Five, do you feel as though Texas prisons should offer conjugal visits? Why or why not? Elaborate. Do you believe Texas prison wardens would support conjugal visits? Explain your answer. Next, in their article, Pleggenkuhle and colleagues (2018) allude to the fact that more than 1/3 of the respondents in their sample had not received a visit during their incarceration. Assuming that visitation has positive benefits for the offender, please provide at least one original suggestion as to how inmates who do not receive visits can still experience some of the positive benefits of visitation? In other words, what, if anything, can be done to help inmates who have very limited close contacts outside the prison walls? Your suggestion should be creative, yet also realistic. Next, in her article, Lynne Haney focuses primarily on incarcerated fathers but has very little to say about incarcerated mothers. In your opinion, if an incarcerated mother is pregnant and has a child, should the newborn child be permitted to live with the mother for any given length of time — even if it is in a prison or prison hospital? Fully elaborate. And, after reflecting upon Haney’s article, please point to one example from the paper which illustrates how recently released inmates may be so tangled up in the child support system that they turn to crime. Be specific. Finally, Haney discusses how former inmates who are entangled in the child support system are often “at the bottom of the dating pool” because of all the issues and complications they must contend with (p. 36). If it is, indeed, true that a reliable female companion can exponentially help a formerly released inmate meet his child support obligations, what can social services agencies, criminal justice agencies, or society as a whole do to help male ex-convicts (especially those with child support obligations) be seen as more viable partners?

In this reflective paper, you will work on different types of evaluation and the

In this reflective paper, you will work on different types of evaluation and their application to evaluations in criminal justice settings. First, you need to summarize different types of evaluation and their purposes. Then, you need to argue which type of evaluation is better for evaluations in criminal justice programs. When writing your paper, you need to benefit from discussions and readings during the last two weeks (Week 3- Planning Evaluation and Week 4-Types of Evaluation). Your reflection paper should be not more than . Use APA

Introduction:  Introduce your topic and key concepts  Convince the reader that

Introduction:  Introduce your topic and key concepts  Convince the reader that your research area is important (Why should we care?)  Briefly explain the state of current knowledge on the topic (This is not a literature review here, just highlight the most essential points/theories)  Make a case for why your research is necessary to advance knowledge on the topic  Clearly state the purpose of your research  Approximately ¾ page Literature Review:  Describe, discuss, and critically evaluate the state of the literature on your topic  Highlight main perspectives used to study the topic and key findings  This is a synthesis of the literature. Rather than summarize each individual study, you should organize your notes on the literature and describe major insights, themes, theoretical perspectives, and the evidence that supports them.  Write an outline first, including notes of where you will cite various sources.  This section should provide a holistic overview of what the experts have to say about your topic.  This section should be written in APA style (see guide below).  Approximately 2.5-3 pages Research Questions (& hypotheses if quantitative):  For inductive research, clearly state your key research questions. Your questions should extend the current literature and be appropriate for qualitative research methods.  For deductive research, explain how you expect your variables to relate. Is something supposed to predict something else? Are certain variables hypothesized to have more impact than others? Clearly state your hypotheses.  Approximately 1 paragraph; hypotheses can be listed References:  List all references in APA style (alphabetical order). You must cite at least 5 academic sources in your literature review

Fyre festival is a classical example of a example of a failed event in recent ti

Fyre festival is a classical example of a example of a failed event in recent times. It was even labeled a Frye Fraud where all the event goers felt they were scammed into the biggest event fraud in the States. Frye festival founded by Billy McFarland CEO of Fyre Media Inc, and rapper Ja Rule with the sole intent of promoting the company’s Fyre app for booking music talent. The festival was scheduled to take place from April 28–30 and May 5–7, 2017, on the Bahamian island of Great Exuma. The event was promoted on Instagram by “social media influencers” including socialite and model Kendall Jenner, Bella Hadid, and model Emily Ratajkowski, many of whom did not initially disclose they had been paid to do so. During the Fyre Festival’s inaugural weekend, the event experienced problems related to security, food, accommodations, medical services and artist relations, resulting in the festival being postponed indefinitely. Instead of the luxury villas and gourmet meals for which festival attendees paid thousands of dollars, they received prepackaged sandwiches and FEMA tents as their accommodations. (A) Based on the above information, articles and the videos to about the event, i want you to give your opinion on FIVE (5) KEY POINTS why the event failed based on the following: 1.Event packages (what was promised/expectations and the actual) 2. Marketing & Sponsorship (influence of social media and its effectiveness in event promotion and marketing) 3. Event Operations (Management of all the aspects such as security, food, accommodation, medical services and vendors managements. 4. Impact of the Stakeholders – most especially residents of Bahama, government and other essential services, and others impacted by the event one way or the other. 5. Preparation time of the event and Timing ( How long it took them to plan the event? and time of the year the event took place on its overall success. (B). Recommend FIVE (5) POSSIBLE WAYS in preventing this type of a event/festival disaster in future. HINTS: You have to watch the videos and read other supporting materials to be able to contribute meaningfully. You are free to watch or seek additional information that could help with substantiating your opinion. The 5 key points should be in bullet form briefly stating your narratives. I will advice you go directly to your point. The key points can both be positive or negative. For example it can be what they got right or wrong in organizing the event based on the 5 sub-headings highlighted above. Each of the key points made will carry 10 points, totaling 50 points. The 5 ways in preventing the event failure in future will carry 10 points each, making 50 points in total. Altogether it will 100 points