by | Dec 22, 2021 | Other : Na
Post a 300- to 500-word response in which you address the following:
Provide a full DSM-5 diagnosis of the client. Remember, a full diagnosis should include the name of the disorder, ICD-10-CM code, specifiers, severity, and the Z codes (other conditions that may be a focus of clinical attention). Keep in mind a diagnosis covers the most recent 12 months.
Explain the diagnosis by matching the symptoms identified in the case to the specific criteria for the diagnosis.
Identify which four diagnoses you initially considered in the case of the client, using the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria to explain why you selected these four items. In one or two sentences each, explain why three of these diagnoses were excluded.
Explain any obvious eliminations that could be made from within the neurodevelopmental spectrum.
Describe in detail how the client’s symptoms match up with the specific diagnostic criteria for the primary disorder that you finally selected for him. Note two other relevant DSM-5 criteria for that illness from the sections on “diagnostic features” and “development and course” that fit this case.
by | Dec 22, 2021 | Other : Na
Assignment: Group Typology
As a clinical social worker it is important to understand group typology in order to choose the appropriate group method for a specific population or problem. Each type of group has its own approach and purpose. Two of the more frequently used types of groups are task groups and intervention groups.
For this Assignment, review the “Cortez Multimedia” case study, and identify a target behavior or issue that needs to be ameliorated, decreased, or increased. In a 2- to 4-page report, complete the following:
Choose either a treatment group or task group as your intervention for Paula Cortez.
Identify the model of treatment group (i.e., support, education, teams, or treatment conferences).
Using the typologies described in the Toseland & Rivas (2017) piece, describe the characteristics of your group. For instance, if you choose a treatment group that is a support group, what would be the purpose, leadership, focus, bond, composition, and communication?
Include the advantages and disadvantages of using this type of group as an intervention.
by | Dec 22, 2021 | Other : Na
. Dr. Sommers-Flanagan’s suicide risk assessment identifies where Tommi is currently: cognitively, physically, and socially because a negative affective impacts these three main areas of an individual’s life. After the cognitive triad, physical, and social relationships assessment; Dr. Sommers-Flanagan begin to ask more direct questions about Tommi’s thoughts on suicide. He mentioned in the review that he wished he assessed for frequency, duration, and intensity (Sommers-Flanagan, J., & Sommers-Flanagan, R., 2014) . However, I believe he did somewhat touch on these points. He asked Tommi how often did she think about suicide: “most of the day, part of the day etc..”; he asked her if her suicidal thoughts were active (here’s how I think I might kill myself) or less active (I kinda wish i was dead) (Sommers-Flanagan, J., & Sommers-Flanagan, R., 2014). I believe that this type of assessment is very thorough and important to gather necessary information.
For Tommi’s safety plan, for the first week, I would ask her to start with creating a regular workout routine. She expressed interest in working out and I believe that is something that is within her control and at her leisure, thus it could be done at anytime, whereas calling her sister might not be effective if her sister is unavailable. Also, I would give her a mood log, to record when she is feeling some type of way because maybe there is a pattern or unidentified triggers.
The risk assessment I would use is the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0, this would be effective because this assessment examines six domains: understanding/communicating, getting around, self- care, getting along with people, life activities, and participation in society (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Tommi being active in these area will reduce her risk of suicide, thus using this assessment throughout the treatment will be a great tool to keep up with Tommi’s progression. The article indicates this measure can be used overtime (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).
Considering Tommi’s cultural background, I would adjust the social aspect of pushing her to talk about her bouts of depression with her friends, just because of the strong stigma around mental disorders in many minority communities. It would be best to allow Tommi to decide when and who she is ready to disclose information.
Omega Green
by | Dec 16, 2021 | Other : Na
To prepare:
Watch the video describing an MSE. Then watch the Sommers-Flanagan (2014) “Mental Status Exam” video clip. Make sure to take notes on the nine domains of the interview.
Review the Morrison (2014) reading on the elements of a diagnostic interview.
Review the 9 Areas to evaluate for a Mental Status Exam and example diagnostic summary write-up provided in this Week’s resources.
Review the case example of a diagnostic summary write-up provided in this Week’s resources.
Write up a Diagnostic Summary including the Mental Status Exam for Carl based upon his interview with Dr. Sommers-Flanagan.
By Day 7
Submit a 2- to 3-page case presentation paper in which you complete both parts outlined below:
Part I: Diagnostic Summary and MSE
Provide a diagnostic summary of the client, Carl. Within this summary include:
Identifying Data/Client demographics
Chief complaint/Presenting Problem
Present illness
Past psychiatric illness
Substance use history
Past medical history
Family history
Mental Status Exam (Be professional and concise for all nine areas)
Appearance
Behavior or psychomotor activity
Attitudes toward the interviewer or examiner
Affect and mood
Speech and thought
Perceptual disturbances
Orientation and consciousness
Memory and intelligence
Reliability, judgment, and insight
Part II: Analysis of MSE
After completing Part I of the Assignment, provide an analysis and demonstrate critical thought (supported by references) in your response to the following:
Identify any areas in your MSE that require follow-up data collection.
Explain how using the cross-cutting measure would add to the information gathered.
Do Carl’s answers add to your ability to diagnose him in any specific way? Why or why not?
Would you discuss a possible diagnosis with Carl at this point in time? Why?
by | Dec 15, 2021 | Other : Na
To prepare:
Watch the video describing an MSE. Then watch the Sommers-Flanagan (2014) “Mental Status Exam” video clip. Make sure to take notes on the nine domains of the interview.
Review the Morrison (2014) reading on the elements of a diagnostic interview.
Review the 9 Areas to evaluate for a Mental Status Exam and example diagnostic summary write-up provided in this Week’s resources.
Review the case example of a diagnostic summary write-up provided in this Week’s resources.
Write up a Diagnostic Summary including the Mental Status Exam for Carl based upon his interview with Dr. Sommers-Flanagan.
By Day 7
Submit a 2- to 3-page case presentation paper in which you complete both parts outlined below:
Part I: Diagnostic Summary and MSE
Provide a diagnostic summary of the client, Carl. Within this summary include:
Identifying Data/Client demographics
Chief complaint/Presenting Problem
Present illness
Past psychiatric illness
Substance use history
Past medical history
Family history
Mental Status Exam (Be professional and concise for all nine areas)
Appearance
Behavior or psychomotor activity
Attitudes toward the interviewer or examiner
Affect and mood
Speech and thought
Perceptual disturbances
Orientation and consciousness
Memory and intelligence
Reliability, judgment, and insight
Part II: Analysis of MSE
After completing Part I of the Assignment, provide an analysis and demonstrate critical thought (supported by references) in your response to the following:
Identify any areas in your MSE that require follow-up data collection.
Explain how using the cross-cutting measure would add to the information gathered.
Do Carl’s answers add to your ability to diagnose him in any specific way? Why or why not?
Would you discuss a possible diagnosis with Carl at this point in time? Why?
