Considering the feedback and the additional time that you have had to reflect on your initial submission, are there any additional changes that you would like to make?

by | Nov 22, 2022 | Supply Chain

By now, you will have received some feedback on your SWOT analysis see attached. What are your thoughts about the feedback that you received? Share with your classmates the nature of the feedback that you received and how you are going to use it to improve your capstone project. Considering the feedback and the additional time that you have had to reflect on your initial submission, are there any additional changes that you would like to make?

8.name five (5) services that a 3pl offers.

by | Nov 21, 2022 | Supply Chain

1.Name five (5) keys to a successful strategic partnership (Note: There are more than 5, but you only need to identify any 5)(Note: you don’t have to describe them, only name them)
2.Name the five (5) key characteristics to consider in the development and implementation of a Supplier Relationship Management system(Note: you don’t have to describe them, only name them)
3.Name the operating philosophy discussed in Chapter 8 that is used to help manage operations in the supply chain.
4.What are the main objectives of the operating philosophy you identified above in Question #3?
5.Name the quality management process discussed in Chapter 8. (hint: it is NOT Total Quality Management)
6.What are the main objectives of the quality management process you identified above in Question #5?
7.What does 3PL stand for (i.e., 3PL is an acronym for what term)?
8.Name five (5) services that a 3PL offers. (Note: you don’t have to describe them, only name them)
9.What is Cross-Docking?
10.Name the five modes of transportation. (Note: you don’t have to describe them, only name them)
Display keyboard shortcuts for Rich Content Editor

Assignment lacks clarity, consistency, and correctness.

by | Nov 20, 2022 | Supply Chain

Instructions: Submit your previously approved research paper here. Review the originality score and the markup of your paper. Make any corrections and then upload your paper into the classroom. Papers are not ready for grading in the classroom unless your instructor can find an originality score in Turnitin AND the APA manuscript word document has been uploaded to your assignment folder in the classroom
Submission Instructions:
This paper should be 3-5 pages in length and is strictly adherent to APA formatting. The rubric for grading is as follows:
APUS Assignment Rubric Undergraduate Level
EXEMPLARYLEVEL
4
ACCOMPLISHED
LEVEL
3
DEVELOPING
LEVEL
2
BEGINNNING
LEVEL
1
POINTS
FOCUS/THESISStudent exhibits a clear understanding of the assignment. Work is clearly defined to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignmentStudent exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the formatting and grammar is not supported throughout the assignment. The reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. Student has limited the quality of the assignment.Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Assignment instructions were not followed. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements. Paper includes more than 25% quotes, which renders it unoriginal.4
SUBJT KNOWLEDGEStudent demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.4
CRITICAL THINKINGStudent demonstrates a higher-level of critical thinking necessary for undergraduate level work. Learner provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions which are not immediately obvious. Student provides well-supported ideas and reflection with a variety of current and/or world views in the assignmentStudent exhibits a good command of critical thinking skills in the presentation of material and supporting statements. Assignment demonstrates the student’s above average use of relating concepts by using a variety of factors. Overall, student provides adequate conclusions, with 2 or fewer errors.Student takes a common, conventional approach in guiding the reader through various linkages and connections presented in assignment. However, student presents a limited perspective on key concepts throughout assignment. Student appears to have problems applying information in a problem-solving manner.Student demonstrates beginning understanding of key concepts, but overlooks critical details. Learner is unable to apply information in a problem-solving fashion. Student presents confusing statements and facts in assignment. No evidence or little semblance of critical thinking skills.4
ORGANIZATION & FORMATStudent thoroughly understands and excels in explaining all major points. An original, unique, and/or imaginative approach to overall ideas, concepts, and findings is presented. Overall format of assignment includes an appropriate introduction, well- developed paragraphs, and conclusion. Finished assignment demonstrates student’s ability to plan and organize research in a logical sequence. Student exhibits excellent format grasp with no more than 5 APA errors.Student explains the majority of points and concepts in the assignment. Learner demonstrates a good skill level in formatting and organizing material in assignment. Student presents an above average level of preparedness, with a few formatting errors. Assignment contains less than 5 resources. Student exhibits good format grasp with no more than 10 APA errors.Learner applies some points and concepts incorrectly. Student uses a variety of formatting styles, with some inconsistencies throughout the paper. Assignment does not have a continuous pattern of logical sequencing. Student uses less than 3 sources or references. Student exhibits fair format grasp with no more than 15 APA errors.Assignment reveals formatting errors and a lack of organization. Student presents an incomplete attempt to provide linkages or explanation of key terms. The lack of appropriate references or source materials demonstrates the student’s need for additional help or training in this area. Student needs to review and revise the assignment. Student exhibits poor format grasp with no more than 15 APA errors.4
GRAMMAR & MECHANICS Student provides an effective display of good writing and grammar. Assignment reflects student’s ability to select appropriate word usage and present an above average presentation of a given topic or issue. Assignment appears to be well written with no more than 3-5 errors. Student provides a final written product that covers the above-minimal requirements. Student exhibits excellent format grasp with no more than 10 contents for grammar, spelling, punctuation, or syntax errors.Assignment reflects basic writing and grammar, but more than 5 errors. Key terms and concepts are somewhat vague and not completely explained by student. Student uses a basic vocabulary in assignment. Student’s writing ability is average, but demonstrates a basic understanding of the subject matter. Student exhibits fair format grasp with no more than 15 grammar, spelling, punctuation, or syntax errors.Topics, concepts, and ideas are not coherently discussed or expressed in assignments. Student’s writing style is weak and needs improvement, along with numerous proofreading errors. Assignment lacks clarity, consistency, and correctness. Student exhibits poor format grasp with more than 15 errors and did not focus critical thinking use of critical thinking grammar APA format subject knowledge with communities grammar, spelling, punctuation, or syntax errors.4
TTurned in on time1 day late2 days lateMore than 2 days late4
Total Points24/ 24= 100%

Due Date
Nov 20, 2022 11:59 PM
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: TLMT Assignment Rubric Undergraduate Level 300-400
Print Rubric
CriteriaExemplaryAccomplished
Developing
Beginning
Criterion Score
FOCUS/THESIS
20 points
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is
clearly defined and well constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds
upon the thesis of the assignment with well documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or
statements.
17 points
Establishes a good
comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student
demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements
helping to support the key focus of assignment.
15 points
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but
the thesis is not fully
supported throughout the
assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in
seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and
statements, this has
limited the quality of the assignment.
13 points
Exhibits a limited
understanding of the
assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key
themes. Introduction of thesis is not clearly evident, and reader must look deeper to discover
the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or
statements.
Score of FOCUS/THESIS,
/ 20
CONTENT/SUBJECT KNOWLEDGE
16 points
Student demonstrates
proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level
of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to
practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive
analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
13.6 points
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented
provide an adequate
presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.
12 points
The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental
understanding of the
course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student
generally explains
concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
10.4 points
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents
concepts in isolation,
and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
Score of CONTENT/SUBJECT KNOWLEDGE,
/ 16
CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS
16 points
Student demonstrates a
higher-level of critical thinking necessary for this level of work. Learner provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking,
while drawing logical
conclusions which are not immediately obvious. Student provides well supported ideas and
reflection with a variety of current and/or world views
in the assignment. Student presents a genuine intellectual development of
ideas throughout
assignment.
13.6 points
Student exhibits a good command of critical thinking skills in the presentation of material and supporting statements. Assignment
demonstrates the
student’s above average use of relating concepts by
using a variety of factors. Overall, student provides
adequate conclusions, with 2 or fewer errors.
12 points
Student takes a common, conventional approach in guiding the reader through various linkages and
connections presented in assignment. However, student presents a limited
perspective on key
concepts throughout
assignment. Student
appears to have problems applying information in a problem-solving manner.
10.4 points
Student demonstrates beginning understanding
of key concepts, but
overlooks critical details. Learner is unable to apply information in a
problem-solving fashion. Student presents confusing statements and facts in assignment. No evidence or little
semblance of critical
thinking skills.
Score of CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS,
/ 16
ORGANIZATION OF IDEAS/FORMAT
16 points
Student thoroughly
understands and excels in explaining all major points. An original, unique, and/or imaginative approach to overall ideas, concepts, and findings is presented.
Overall format of
assignment includes an appropriate introduction (or
abstract), well- developed paragraphs, and
conclusion. Finished
assignment demonstrates student’s ability to plan and organize research in a logical sequence. Student
uses at least of 5-7
references in assignment.
13.6 points
Student explains the
majority of points and concepts in the
assignment. Learner
demonstrates a good skill level in formatting and
organizing material in assignment. Student presents an above average level of preparedness, with a few formatting errors.
Assignment contains less than 5 resources.
12 points
Learner applies some
points and concepts
incorrectly. Student uses a variety of formatting styles, with some inconsistencies throughout the paper. Assignment
does not have a
continuous pattern of logical sequencing.
Student uses less than 3 sources or references.
10.4 points
Assignment reveals
formatting errors and a lack of organization.
Student presents an
incomplete attempt to provide linkages or explanation of key
terms. The lack of appropriate references or source materials demonstrates the student’s need for
additional help or
training in this area.
Student needs to review and revise the assignment.
Score of ORGANIZATION OF IDEAS/FORMAT,
/ 16
WRITING CONVENTIONS (GRAMMAR & MECHANICS)
16 points
Student demonstrates an
excellent command of grammar, as well as presents research in a clear and concise writing style.
Presents a thorough, extensive understanding of
word usage. Student
excels in the election and
development of a well planned research assignment. Assignment is error-free and reflects student’s ability to prepare a high-quality academic
assignment.
13.6 points
Student provides an
effective display of good writing and grammar. Assignment reflects
student’s ability to select appropriate word usage and present an above
average presentation of a given topic or issue. Assignment appears to be well written with no more
than 3-5 errors. Student provides a final written product that covers the above-minimal requirements.
12 points
Assignment reflects basic writing and grammar, but more than 5 errors. Key
terms and concepts are somewhat vague and not completely explained by student. Student uses a basic vocabulary in assignment. Student’s writing ability is average,
but demonstrates a basic understanding of the subject matter.
10.4 points
Topics, concepts, and
ideas are not coherently discussed or expressed in assignments. Student’s writing style is weak and needs improvement, along with numerous proofreading errors. Assignment lacks clarity, consistency, and correctness. Student needs to review and revise assignment.
Score of WRITING CONVENTIONS (GRAMMAR & MECHANICS),
/ 16
USE OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY/ APPLICATIONS
16 points
Student provides a high caliber, formatted assignment. Learner
exhibits excellent use of computer technology in the
development of
assignment. Quality and appropriateness of stated references demonstrate the
student’s ability to use technology to conduct applicable research. Given assignment includes
appropriate word
processing, spreadsheet and/or other computer applications as part of the final product.
13.6 points
Assignment presents an above-average use of formatting skills, with less than 3 errors. Students has a good command of computer applications to
format information and/or figures in an appropriate format. Student uses at least two types of computer applications to produce a quality assignment.
12 points
Student demonstrates a basic knowledge of computer applications. Appearance of final
assignment demonstrates
the student’s limited ability to format and present data. Resources used in
assignment are limited. Student may need to obtain further help in the use of computer
applications and Internet research.
10.4 points
Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The student may need to take additional training or obtain help while preparing an assignment. Research and resources presented
in the assignment are limited. Student needs to expand research scope. The number of formatting errors is not acceptable.
Score of USE OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY/ APPLICATIONS,
/ 16
TotalScore of TLMT Assignment Rubric Undergraduate Level 300-400,
/ 100Overall Score
Exemplary90 points minimum
Accomplished80 points minimum
Developing70 points minimum
Beginning0 points minimum