See attachments for the statement of purpose to be revised. When answering give

See attachments for the statement of purpose to be revised. When answering give reason(s) as to why
1st Post
Complete the Following:
Choose an organization’s website you visit regularly, one where you read a lot of the content.
Keep it G-Rated, and no overtly religious or political sites.
You
may want to use this website for the remainder of the course (for analysis, a content strategy proposal, and two more projects). As a
heads up, you will be choosing your primary organization shortly.
For this website:
write out the purpose, and
a brief audience analysis.
Then, do the following:
1. Identify the writing voice of the website in a word or two using a label or category that describes its essential characteristic.
Is it formal, professional, institutional, fun & friendly, direct, clever, poetic, etc.?
Does this match the needs of the audience and purpose of the website?
If not, what type of writing voice would work better? Identify the more appropriate voice in a word or two.
2. Generate a list of attributes for that particular voice.
For example, the attributes of a professional voice are direct, strong, authoritative, fact-based, etc.
3. Role-play by writing something in that voice, at least a paragraph.
See the examples in chapter 4 for more information.
Include
a link to the organization’s website at the top of your post.
Remember, because this source is a website, a References list is not
needed. 🙂
2nd/3rd Posts
Complete the Following:
Choose two (2) fellow writers’ posts which have less than two responses.
Thoroughly respond to the following questions/prompts, with at least two (2) well written paragraphs.
Would
the writing voice identified by your fellow writer be effective for use
with this organization’s social media? Why or why not. If not, what
kind of writing voice might work better?
Explain
one way the organization could use social media to their advantage. If
they already use social media, based on your new understanding of
writing voice, how could their use of social media be improved?

Choose a website that is horribly designed. It must be a real site, though if th

Choose a website that is horribly designed. It must be a real site, though if the site you want to recreate
is too big, you should select a specific portion of it. Ideally, it is one you enjoy using, and have thought
‘man, if I build this, I would have done it this way…’ — so you’ve used it enough to have some real
thoughts about what you’d do differently. You will then choose a target user — the person for whom you
wish to restructure the application to improve his/her experience. Such a user may be one you might
encounter in real life (e.g., ‘single mothers, 25- 45, who live in the South’) or more imaginary (e.g., ‘wood elves’). You will then re-envision the interfaces and functionality of the web experience, in such
a way as to improve the user experience of that target user. You will also perform other UX tasks.
1. Find a crappy (poorly designed) website that needs a new design or design a new website
If existing site – provide URL and an explanation of what makes this a crappy site
If new – provide a brief description
2. Define your project objective
Define your projects goals and objectives, as well as success metrics
3. Define the sites requirements
My chosen website for this assignment is: https://craigslist.org/
**This assignment needs to be written in a Word Document

Choose a website that is horribly designed. It must be a real site, though if th

Choose a website that is horribly designed. It must be a real site, though if the site you want to recreate
is too big, you should select a specific portion of it. Ideally, it is one you enjoy using, and have thought
‘man, if I build this, I would have done it this way…’ — so you’ve used it enough to have some real
thoughts about what you’d do differently. You will then choose a target user — the person for whom you
wish to restructure the application to improve his/her experience. Such a user may be one you might
encounter in real life (e.g., ‘single mothers, 25- 45, who live in the South’) or more imaginary (e.g., ‘wood elves’). You will then re-envision the interfaces and functionality of the web experience, in such
a way as to improve the user experience of that target user. You will also perform other UX tasks.
1.Find a crappy (poorly designed) website that needs a new design or design a new website
If existing site – provide URL and an explanation of what makes this a crappy site
If new – provide a brief description
2.Define your project objective
Define your projects goals and objectives, as well as success metrics
3.Define the sites requirements
My chosen website for this assignment is: https://craigslist.org/
**This assignment needs to be written in a Word Document

Choose a website that is horribly designed. It must be a real site, though if th

Choose a website that is horribly designed. It must be a real site, though if the site you want to recreate
is too big, you should select a specific portion of it. Ideally, it is one you enjoy using, and have thought
‘man, if I build this, I would have done it this way…’ — so you’ve used it enough to have some real
thoughts about what you’d do differently. You will then choose a target user — the person for whom you
wish to restructure the application to improve his/her experience. Such a user may be one you might
encounter in real life (e.g., ‘single mothers, 25- 45, who live in the South’) or more imaginary (e.g., ‘wood elves’). You will then re-envision the interfaces and functionality of the web experience, in such
a way as to improve the user experience of that target user. You will also perform other UX tasks.
1. Find a crappy (poorly designed) website that needs a new design or design a new website
If existing site – provide URL and an explanation of what makes this a crappy site
If new – provide a brief description
2. Define your project objective
Define your projects goals and objectives, as well as success metrics
3. Define the sites requirements
My chosen website for this assignment is: https://craigslist.org/
**This assignment needs to be written in a Word Document

You will pick a user interface to evaluate. This could be your favorite (or fav

You will pick a user interface to evaluate. This could be your favorite (or favorite to hate) website, grocery store checkout system, etc. You will then systematically evaluate the pros and cons of the selected software in terms of usabilty. Again, I want at least three peer-reviewed references for how you address usability.
Note: Make sure to satisfy 4 things below in this paper
– Length (more than 500 words)
– Focus & Details: There is one clear, well-focused topic. Main ideas are clear and are well supported by detailed and accurate information.
– Grammar: All sentences are well constructed and have varied structure and length. The author makes no errors in grammar, mechanics, and/or spelling.
– References: Writing is entirely in the author’s own words. References are appropriately and consistently cited. Limited use of Wikipedia or other non peer-reviewed sources (at least three peer-reviewed references for how you address usability).

You will pick a user interface to evaluate. This could be your favorite (or fav

You will pick a user interface to evaluate. This could be your favorite (or favorite to hate) website, grocery store checkout system, etc. You will then systematically evaluate the pros and cons of the selected software in terms of usabilty. Again, I want at least three peer-reviewed references for how you address usability.
Note: Make sure to satisfy 4 things below in this paper
– Length (more than 500 words)
– Focus & Details: There is one clear, well-focused topic. Main ideas are clear and are well supported by detailed and accurate information.
– Grammar: All sentences are well constructed and have varied structure and length. The author makes no errors in grammar, mechanics, and/or spelling.
– References: Writing is entirely in the author’s own words. References are appropriately and consistently cited. Limited use of Wikipedia or other non peer-reviewed sources (at least three peer-reviewed references for how you address usability).