Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of collaborating with physician organizations when pursuing FPA legislation.
The discussion must address the topic.
Rationale must be provided
Minimum of two scholarly references in APA format within the last five years published
The paper is to consist of your research on a specific drug or class of drugs.
The essay should include:
Type or class.
Related paraphernalia to use it.
Drug(s) name/classification.
Signs/symptoms of use.
Street name(s).
Prevention/Rehabilitation.
Description of physiological effects. Statistics related to use and abuse.
How it is used/abused.
I have attached my paper that is currently in progress… Please obly add to it what is listed below. The two models and conclusion
For the first part of this phase apply two decision-making models described by Hammaker and Knadig (2017) to explain why the action being considered is ethical or unethical (based upon your issue and thesis statement). As part of the ethical decision-making process evaluate why the two models are a valid way to decide whether an action or situation is ethical or unethical. In addition, for both models discuss its strengths and limitations towards decision-making.
Models for Decision-Making
Social Media Model
Utility Model
Rights Model
Exceptions Model
Choices Model
Justice Model
Common Good Model
Virtue Model
**Use appropriate APA headings when applying both models.
Conclusion
For the second part of this phase remind the audience of your position and supporting evidence. Summarize the most important details from your research and try for the last time to try to convince the audience. The conclusion should illustrate that you have thought critically and analytically about the ethical issue.
Consider these pointers when writing the conclusion:
Your conclusion should not simply restate your intro paragraph. If your conclusion says almost the exact same thing as your introduction, it may indicate that you have not done enough critical thinking during the course of your research project.
Your conclusion should tell us why we should care about your research. What is the significance of your claim? Why is it important to you as the writer or to the reader/audience? What information should you or the audience take away from this?
Vivid, concrete language is as important in a conclusion as it is elsewhere–perhaps more essential, since the conclusion determines the audience’s final impression of your research. Do not leave them with the impression that your position was vague or unsure.
It’s fine to introduce new information or quotations in your conclusions, if the new points grow from your argument. New points might be more general, answering the “so what” question; they might be quite specific. Just avoid making new claims that need lots of additional support.
The conclusion of your research project should be at least four to five paragraphs with support.
Answer the following questions:
Define the following groups of terms:
Primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention
Prepathogenesis and pathogenesis
How does screening for disease align with the three levels of prevention – primary, secondary and tertiary?
Define the following terms that are related to screening tests:
Reliability and validity
Sensitivity and Specificity
Predictive value (+) and predictive value (-)
What are the most appropriate applications of mass screening and selective screening? Give one example each of a mass screening test and a selective screening test.
How could screening performed in conjunction with disease surveillance contribute to the alleviation of work-related hazardous exposures?
What is meant by overdiagnosis?
Conduct a web search for “whole body scans”. They are CT scans of the entire body and are promoted as a method for early detection of abnormalities. Using your own ideas, construct a list of the advantages and disadvantages of whole body scans and reach a conclusion. To what extent are whole body scans related to the issue of overdiagnosis?
Why is newborn screening important for public health practice? Give examples of programs for newborn screening.
What is a method used for developmental screening? At what ages is developmental screening most relevant?
Calculate the specificity, sensitivity, predictive value (+), and predictive value (-) using the following data:
Disease Present Disease Absent
Screening Test (+) 59 12
Screening Test (-) 18 189
11. Describe methods of screening for each of the following conditions:
Breast cancer
Colon cancer
Type 2 Diabetes
Elevated lipid levels
Hypertension
HIV
Genetic screening (BRCA gene)
Instructions: Read the following case study and answer the reflective questions. Please provide
rationales for your answers.
Make sure to provide citations/references for your answers in APA
format.
CASE STUDY: Preschool Child: Ricky
Ricky, age 4 years, arrives in the clinic with his mother. Ricky lives with his mother and father, who
both work full-time, and his infant sister. Their extended family lives in a different state more than
100 miles away. Both parents are of average height and in good health. Ricky’s mother mentions
that Ricky often expresses frustration, particularly in regard to food. Conflict over food occurs every
day. Mealtime is a battle to get him to eat, unless his mother feeds him. Ricky’s baby sister seems to
tolerate all baby foods but requires her mother to spoon-feed. Ricky’s mother is quite frustrated and
concerned that he will become malnourished.
Reflective Questions
1. What additional assessment information would you collect?
2. What questions would you ask, and how would you further explore this issue with the
mother?
3. In what ways does the distance of the extended family influence this family’s approach to
health promotion?
4. What factors would you consider to determine whether malnourishment is a factor in this
family?
Research Paper Requirements:
5 pages of research following APA format.
12 point font and double spaced.
Title Page: (Not Included in your 5 pages)
Abstract Page: (Not Included in your 5 pages, this is a brief summary of your paper)
Body: This is your 5 pages of research. Page 5 will be titled (Clinical Discussion) On this page you will relate an event or situation on how this involves Emergency Medical System response and how we will assist or deal with your research.
Each paper will have a 1 inch heading (The title of your paper/Upper left hand corner).
Each page will be numbered (Upper right hand corner)
Reference Page (Not included in your 5 pages) *Your textbook has to be used as one of your references. A minimum of 3 references will be used following the APA format.
Your research paper can be any topic of your choosing as long as your textbook can be used as a reference. I have listed a few websites to help with your paper.
