by admin | Dec 1, 2022 | Social Science
Please respond to Michelle with 150 words
Course: BRE 101, Real Estate Practice
Student Name: Michelle
Today’s Date: 11/16/2022
Textbook Author: Huber Walt.
Overview
Chapter 7 had a lot of information on completing a residential purchase agreement that included the need to specify close dates and that sometimes two loans are needed. Chapter 8, however, had information about marketing for free on social media platforms.
Key Concept From Chapter 7
In chapter 7, what stood out to me was that escrow was unable to close on weekends of legal holidays(pg 206). When you are going through the process of closing escrow, the date must be specific.
Key Concept From Chapter 8
The second key concept I learned in this chapter is that in order to market to the clients that you want, you need to be able to persuade the client that you will “cater to their needs”. (pg 265) This is great for agents because you don’t need to pay out of pocket to promote yourself on social media platforms.
Key Concept From Chapter 7
Lastly, in chapter 7, I learned that sometimes a buyer may need two loans. (pg 210) In the RPA, the loan can be found on paragraph 3D, and if the buyer puts a down, that amount should also be included.
Summary
Overall in these two chapters, I learned that in order to successfully market, you have to find a way to self promote. Also, escrow cannot close on legal holidays.
by admin | Dec 1, 2022 | Social Science
Abstract (10 pts)
An abstract is a brief statement (usually a paragraph or two) that is placed at the beginning of a
paper. Its purpose is to briefly explain what the paper is about; thus, it lets the reader know what will be
discussed (commonly so the reader can decide whether he wants to continue reading it). It also sets a
frame of reference for the reader if he or she decides to continue.
For this assignment, you are simply setting a frame of reference for the reader.
Approximately 100 words
PAGE THREE and BEYOND [For each section, please begin a new page.]
Observation and Models (20 pts)
In this section simply insert what you are supposed to do for the second homework assignment. If
what you did for that assignment is perfect, all you need do is include it here. If it is not perfect,
you need to fix any problems that exist.
Findings and Results (15 pts)
This section is asking how you would interpret certain results.
What is the data that you would collect and how does it relate to your research question? In the
previous section, you described critical experiments, but the description may have been somewhat
vague. In this section, you are being asked precisely how you would do these experiments.
In the above section, you described critical experiments, and you described the data you would
collect to do these experiments. You now need to describe how you would interpret the data.
This should have been touched on in the above section. If what you did in the previous section
was very complete, all you need to do is repeat it. For others it is another opportunity to get it
complete. To remind you of what you need to do, let’s revisit the example discussed in class: if
you find that people respect lawyers more than professors, that will mean something different
from finding that people respect professors more than lawyers.
For each model:
Describe what results you would need to find in order to support the model.
Describe what results would contradict or fail to support your model.
If the data failed to support your model, what other models might these data support?
References (15 Points)
Note: You are not being asked to write a literature review. This is a list of references. Because
this is not a true, complete research paper, you may not have actually used any references. Thus,
you need to find books, journal articles, electronic sources, etc. that are (at least slightly) related to
what your paper is about. The purpose of this section of the assignment is correctly using APA
format, not doing in-depth research.
Cite at least six sources (books, newspapers, internet, etc.). You will earn more points, if they
come from a wide variety of sources (e.g., one book, one journal, one newspaper, one website,
etc.) If the nature of your question makes it difficult to find a wide variety of sources, talk to you
TA about getting an exemption from this requirement.
The citations need to be in APA format and alphabetized. (See the syllabus for links to webpages
that can help with APA format.)
AT THIS POINT, YOUR PAPER IS FINISHED, BUT THERE ARE 10 ADDITIONAL POINTS
Well Written (10 points)
If the writing is clear and concise (following what we read in the Williams text), you will get 10
additional points.
Reminder: 20 points have already been assigned from the class assignments/homeworks. What is
being turned in now is worth 80 points. Thus, the total score for this assignment has been 100
points.
by admin | Dec 1, 2022 | Social Science
Criteria:
-Address a topic from Part 3 (Sentencing)
-Single-spaced
-12 point font, times new roman
-About 1-2 pages
-NO outside sources, use assigned course materials and use embedded citations
-A reference page is not needed because your sources are assigned text
These written assignments will be in the form of a “Quotation-Comment-Question” or “Q-C-Q”. Start by locating a quotation in one of the assigned texts within a given course topic that you find interesting or controversial and worthy of further discussion. Next, discuss the quotation: explain its significance in the context of course themes in 400 to 500 words. Finally, pose one question that will prompt further discussion of the issue. This discussion question should not be a clarifying question about the material. The purpose of these assignments is to think critically about and to apply socio-legal knowledge to issues of sentencing and punishment. Do not simply define terms or summarize content. Make use of the readings and materials assigned in the weeks preceding the reflection deadline. You will be evaluated on how well you follow instructions and how well you explain your quotation using course themes.
by admin | Dec 1, 2022 | Social Science
Last week you worked on developing your area of focus based on an existing problem or challenge in early childhood education that you would like to change or improve. This week you will gain deeper insight into your area of focus by reviewing and evaluating literature related to your area of focus.
For this assignment, you will utilize appropriate databases and digital tools to identify two academic sources relevant to your action research area of focus. You will evaluate each source for research timeliness, relevancy, authority, accuracy, and purpose. You will identify, evaluate, review, and summarize these two relevant scholarly, credible, or peer-reviewed articles to inform your own action research proposal. The purpose of this assignment is to help you understand what others in the field have done to improve the same or similar challenges that you are interested in improving. Articles must be current, meaning each article must have been published in the past five years. For more information, watch the ECE660 Week 2 video Links to an external site.below.
PrepareTo prepare for this discussion, review the following resources as needed:
Writing a Literature Review Links to an external site.from the UAGC Writing Center
Choosing the Best Sources and Evidence Links to an external site.from the UAGC Writing Center
What is CRAAP? A Guide to Evaluating Web Sources Links to an external site.from the UAGC Library
Choosing Articles and Revising Searches Links to an external site.from the UAGC Library
Evaluating Resources Links to an external site., from the UAGC Library
Library OneSearch Links to an external site.tip sheet from the UAGC Library
Keywords Are Critical Links to an external site.from the UAGC Library
Use the UAGC Library or appropriate digital research tools (e.g., Google Scholar) to locate scholarly, credible, or peer-reviewed sources for this assignment. Remember, not all sources and articles in the UAGC Library are scholarly, so please be sure to refer to the Instructor Guidance for this week further tips and information on locating scholarly, peer reviewed journals.
RefWorksPart of research is tracking and maintaining all the articles and other sources needed for your research. RefWorks is a tool available to UAGC students to help them save and organize resources for current and future research. Additionally, you can save your article notes (i.e., the information you included in the template used for the Week 2 discussion) using RefWorks. Review the RefWorks Notetaking and Peer-Sharing Guide Links to an external site.for more information. If this is your first time using RefWorks, review the following resources:
RefWorks 2.0 Quick Start GuideLinks to an external site.
Creating a RefWorks AccountLinks to an external site.
Write: Content ExpectationsUsing the ECE660 Week 2 Action Research Proposal Literature Evaluation Template Download ECE660 Week 2 Action Research Proposal Literature Evaluation Template, similar to the one you used in the discussion this week, complete the below requirements. Keep in mind, in your final action research proposal, you will convert the information your added to the tables in the template into paragraph form.
Select two scholarly, credible, or peer-reviewed full-text articles related to your area of focus and research questions.You may use the article you reviewed in the discussion this week as one of the two resources required for review and evaluation.
Summarize your area of focus and the associated problem statement or situation for your action research proposal.
Restate your research question.
Part 1: Article Summary Tables
For each of the two articles, complete one table with the following information below. Each section must be complete and add relevant information related to the article.
CRAAP Test: Evaluate each article for currency, relevancy, authority, accuracy, and purpose.Provide the overall score and a narrative with a summary of your evaluation.
Title, Author, Year: Provide an accurate title, author, and year of publication.
RefWorks Link: Include the link to the location of the article saved in your RefWorks account.
Purpose of the Study: Explain the purpose of the study.
Subject/Participants: Discuss the subjects or participants involved in the study.
Variables: Identify the independent and dependent variables in the study.
Quantitative and/or Qualitative Instruments: Examine the instruments used to collect data, including any pertinent information on the validity and reliability of the instrumen
Interventions: Summarize the interventions used in the study to improve a situation or existing challenge that the research addressed.
Outcomes/Results: Explain what kind of evidence is used to support his/her claim
Implications: Examine the implications and conclusions of the study.
Relevance to Proposed Study: Appraise how the study relates to the challenge or situation you are interested in improving in your action research proposal.
Part 2: Literature Evaluation Table
Complete the summary table after completing each of the article summary tables. The purpose of this table is for you to synthesize information from the articles you reviewed to determine how each one will inform your own action research proposal, specifically focusing in the interventions and qualitative and quantitative instruments.
Literature Evaluation Table: Use the literature evaluation table to organize your decisions regarding which interventions and instruments are the most relevant to your own action research proposal, based on your two article summaries.
Part 3: Relevance, Terms and Application
Identify one early childhood theory that could be used to support your proposal.
Define research related terms.
Describe what intervention you would suggest and why.
Research and Resource ExpectationsA minimum of two scholarly, credible or peer-reviewed sources, in addition to the course textbook, are required.
Next StepsReview your assignment with the Grading Rubric to ensure you have achieved the distinguished levels of performance for each criterion. Submit the assignment for evaluation no later than Da
The Action Research Proposal: Literature Evaluation paperMust be five to six double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA Style Links to an external site.as outlined in the Writing Center’s APA Formatting for Microsoft WordLinks to an external site.
Must include a separate title page with the following:Title of paper in bold fontSpace should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page.
Student’s name
Name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Due date
Must utilize academic voice. See the Academic Voice Links to an external site.resource for additional guidance.
Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.For assistance on writing Introductions & Conclusions Links to an external site.and Writing a Thesis Statement Links to an external site., refer to the Writing Center resources.
Must use at least two scholarly or credible sources in addition to the course text.The Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources Links to an external site.table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source.
To assist you in completing the research required for this assignment, view Quick and Easy Library Research Links to an external site.tutorial, which introduces the University of Arizona Global Campus Library and the research process, and provides some library search tips.
Must document any information used from sources in APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center’s APA: Citing Within Your PaperLinks to an external site.
Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Writing Center. See the APA: Formatting Your References List Links to an external site.resource in the Writing Center for specifications.
Carefully review the Grading Rubric Links to an external site.for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.
by admin | Dec 1, 2022 | Social Science
For this assignment, you will listen to one (1) podcast episode OR watch one (1) TedTalk video of your choosing and write at least a 500-word response summarizing and commenting on the important issue in public health discussed throughout the episode.
Guidelines:
Part 1: A Summary of the Work
Identify the source, title, and date of the podcast episode or video, including the speakers.
Identify the main problem or issue that the podcast episode or video is addressing.
Summarize the three (3) main ideas and key supporting points of the episode or video.
Use direct quotations from the work to illustrate important ideas.
Keep the summary objective and factual. Do not include your personal reaction to the work in the first part of the paper; your subjective impression will form the basis of the second part of your paper.
Part 2: Your Reaction to the Work
Focus on the following questions:Why is the problem or topic discussed important or interesting?
How is the podcast episode related to your life, experiences, feelings, and ideas? What emotions did the episode arouse in you?
How does the podcast episode relate to the ideas and concerns discussed in this course? What points made in the textbook, class discussions, or lectures are discussed throughout the episode?
How did the podcast episode increase your understanding of a particular issue or change your perspective in any way?
You should also indicate whether or not you would recommend the podcast to others and why.
Your paper should include a title page and references in APA (where appropriate), double-spaced, and use Times New Roman, 12 point.
by admin | Nov 29, 2022 | Social Science
Hello, I need help with two Ethic questions. Each question MUST be answered on time and in complete detail. No repeated sentences and NO PLAGURIZING!! The answers must make sense and completely answer the questions. Please do not bid if you aren’t knowledgeable in ethics and/or will not be able to complete the assignment on time!
Q1)-[Radical Subjectivism] *****People sometimes justify their moral views and beliefs by claiming ‘that is just what I was brought up to believe.’ This appears to be a version of radical subjectivism- a moral principle or belief is true just because I believe it to be true. But people have been brought up to believe all sorts of things. For example, some people were brought up to believe that slavery was morally justifiable. Perhaps a person is brought up to believe that killing people in the name of religious justice is morally acceptable (think about 9/11). Are all these moral beliefs true just because people were brought up to think they were true? If someone acts on their moral beliefs and does something that they believe to be morally justified (like slamming an airliner into a skyscraper and killing thousands of people) does that mean that they are morally justified and that their action is beyond moral criticism? After all, if their belief is true, how can we criticize or object to it? You may not like it, but so what; they do like the action and approve of it. If you say that such actions may be right for them but wrong according to you, what does that mean? Should they perform such acts or not? After all, they have their own moral code- since yours is no more correct or incorrect than theirs, what right do you have to impose your moral code on them?
Q2)-[Ethical Relativism] ****Suppose a Jamaican Rastafarian has become a naturalized American citizen. He supports the laws, votes in political elections, serves on juries, serves as a soccer coach, and is dedicated to his job. But he believes that it is not just morally permissible to smoke marijuana, but that it is morally mandatory- after all, why would God have gone to the trouble of creating a plant and putting it on earth if he didn’t want people to use it? The Rastafarian believes that to not use it is to insult God, akin to not being grateful and using a gift someone has given to you. This is a belief that he shares with other Jamaican Rastafarians, all members of the same society. According to the relativist, if the Rastafarian acts on his moral beliefs and smokes, is he doing something wrong? Why is it wrong, according to the relativist? What issue does this example highlight? Do you think there is a solution to this problem/issue for relativism?
