American History

Answer the following question in at least 400 words.


Based on the course readings, evaluate what the American Revolution meant to at least three different people and whether or not it was, in your estimation, a radical event. To answer this prompt, choose three primary documents from our course representing the sentiments of individuals from different backgrounds. Examine the sources to determine how people of the period perceived the Revolution and its meaning. What were their concerns, experiences, values, and biases? Your answer needs to show a clear understanding of how each of these perspectives fit within their political and social context by using the textbook, videos, and other readings.

A successful assignment requires you to analyze the primary documents and meet the following expectations:

Use at least three of the primary documents from this unit.
Develop your argument by providing a thesis statement, evidence to support it, and a clear statement of the significance of this topic and your position.

Analyze each primary source by considering its historical context, its author, and the rhetoric of the text.
Utilize the secondary sources (textbook, videos, etc.) to place each primary document in historical context.
Be sure to organize your response around a thesis, with logical paragraph development, and with proper grammar and spelling.

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aia/part3/3narr1.html 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9s_LLBKM8E4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=notJuFGXQ9w

Discussion

Week 2 Addendum

  • Discussion

    • Identify an influencing factor that must be considered when revising or developing a curriculum today. Conduct a literature search for evidence to support the importance of this factor. Be sure to include the following in your initial post:

      • The influencing factor you identified

      • A brief summary of the influencing factor

      • Your position regarding the topic

      • An argument for your identified position, supported with evidence from your literature search

      • Specific implications for curriculum development.

    • Support or refute the positions of your classmates in your peer responses. 

Rubric
-Timeliness: Initial post is completed by the third day.
-Completeness: Submitted a complete initial post. Addresses all of the question prompts, identified, interpreted, or inferred to the discussion topic being addressed, explored and/or explained the topic and how it applied to the discussion forum, and analyzed the topic being discussed and applied it to a fact and/or advocated a position or recommendation. 
-Peer Response: Posted peer responses on 2 additional days after the initial discussion post, posted a minimum of two substantial responses to peers that drive the discussion forward. Substantial responses successfully show evidence of accurately interpreting topical knowledge, identifying relevant arguments, evaluating alternative points of view, justifying key results, explaining assumptions, and/or drawing upon reasonable and thoughtful conclusions. A minimum of one peer response post is supported with at least one separate scholarly source dated within the last 5 years unless considered seminal work. Examples of scholarly sources are journal articles, assigned readings, textbooks, lectures, course materials, or authoritative websites. Posts contain proper spelling and grammar and include 0-1 errors. Student organized the content, the flow was logical and clear, and the student’s writing included the use of professional language. 
-APA: All sources used in discussion post(s) include properly formatted APA in-text citation(s) and full references. APA style includes 0-1 error. 

Organ Donation and Transplantation

This week you will submit the final draft of your term paper. Your term paper should:

  • Discuss the technical aspects of your topic in general terms.
  • Discuss the public policy debates relevant to the topic you choose. This section should cover arguments that favor and oppose the use of the techniques or products.
  • Express your personal opinion regarding the topic’s importance and the validity of the pro and con arguments.

Your submission must include:

  • A title page
  • The body of the paper, which includes 46 content pages of a professionally written text
  • At least three references from textbooks, websites, and articles that provide adequate justification and support your claim
  • Subheadings (technical aspects, public policy, and personal opinion/conclusion)
  • Appropriate in-text citations throughout the paper
  • A reference list with only the sources used in the body of the paper (All sources should be less than five years old unless recent research is not available, and at least one reference must be a peer-reviewed article from a professional journal. Do not use Wikipedia or an encyclopedia as they are not considered reliable academic sources and will not be accepted.)
  • APA style formatting throughout your paper

Review the rubric for specific grading criteria.

Attached is a previous shorter paper regarding the topic.

topic is, “Organ Donation and Transplantation”


Discussion

This week we’re exploring causation and correlation.

  • Why is it a fallacy to confuse causation and correlation?
  • Provide an example of a statement that confuses causation with correlation.
  • conclusions and then a question to my classmates