DESCRIPTION:The Final Assignment should be written from the point of view of con

DESCRIPTION:The Final Assignment should be written from the point of view of convincing the instructor to include a film not currently on the course list as a screening. To do this, students will have to develop an argument and explain the relevance of the film to the course goals and the study of Film History. CONTENT:The Final Assignment should answer the question “Why include this film in the course?”,or put differently, “How does this film add to our study of Film History?” You will make this argument by choosing a chapter of the textbook (Dixon and Foster’s A Short History of Film) and then show how the film could be taught alongside it. For example, you might select a film that exemplifies a different film movement that could hypothetically be added to the course, or which would give a different perspective on a movement like Classical Hollywood Cinema. Or perhaps you could use a film to help illustrate Dixon and Foster’s gaps or blind spots. It would be desirable to single out one or two scenes and explain how they could be used in the classroom for close examination.No essay that does not develop an argument linking your chosen film to a single chapter of A Short History of Film will pass. You will be evaluated on understanding of the elements of film history we have studied and your ability to usefully connect them with the film you are writing about.Please follow the style guide and use the essay template. Any material you reference (including A Short History of Film) must be properly cited, including the use of page numbers; failures to cite properly may result in a plagiarism case. If you do other research, it must be of peer-reviewed material published by a reputable academic publisher.
MORE DETAIL ON ASSIGNMENT ADDED BELOW

This is for a graduate course on Strategic Leadership. Choose any Harry Potter m

This is for a graduate course on Strategic Leadership. Choose any Harry Potter movie. Watch the movie with an eye toward leadership styles and team/group development/organization structures. Write an analysis of the movie (at least 500 words). In your analysis think about the following: -Impact of “environment” (place/space/setting) -Leader’s handling of the group -Leader’s handling of individuals -Use of language and instructions -Supportive behavior or not -Use of props and equipment -Organizational structure, who is in charge -… Plus motivation, use of support staff, etc.

The final essay requires that you compare and contrast an original versus a sequ

The final essay requires that you compare and contrast an original versus a sequel; or an original versus a remake. The essay must provide an analysis of these two version, covering 1. Cinematography (camerawork, lighting, mise-en-scene, color tones) in both versions 2. Editing (continuity editing, etc.) in both versions 3. Sound (diegetic and non-diegetic) in both versions 4. Screenwriting (dialogue) in both versions 5. Special Effects in both versions (independent research is likely necessary) 6. Directing (point of view of the story; characters; message of the film, etc.) in both versions 7. Overall analysis of both version – focusing on director’s delivery of all of the above 8. Each technique reference includes a description of a scene and the impact on the audience. 9. 80% must focus on the core elements of cinematography, editing, sound, screenwriting, special effects, and directing. 10. Bibliography APA or MLA Attached is the rubric I need a direct comparison of the 2003 Texas Chainsaw Massacre vs the 1973 film