Complete this discussion as if you are a social worker. Documenting (as if you a

Complete this discussion as if you are a social worker. Documenting (as if you are in court) clearly and stating specific names is important or the instructor deducts points. 1 double-spaced page, complete the following discussion questions, after completing the reading assignments viewing the module PowerPoints, and YouTube videos.
Discussion Questions:
Macro practice always involves human interaction, and any interpersonal interaction involves an intricate web of communication and interpersonal skills. Identify three micro skills that might benefit a worker during a macro-level intervention and describe the benefit of each.
Discuss at least three cultural differences in nonverbal behavior that workers should be sensitive to when communicating in the macro environment. Which of the behaviors from questions 1 and 2 might be inappropriate when communicating with culturally diverse groups?
Consider the importance of empathy in developing multicultural awareness. Search for relevant articles in other databases with terms such as “empathy” and “multicultural awareness. Identify and describe a situation you have observed or encountered where poor communication resulted in a lack of multicultural sensitivity or awareness. Outline how using empathy in this situation could have resulted in increased awareness or sensitivity. Integrate information from your research into your answer. Be sure to cite your sources.
Review your peer’s post Select 1 (1 is required) or more peer’s posts and respond in a way that expands the online conversation by:
1 -Use a strengths-based approach to list the strengths of the post.
2 – Post 1 fact about the topic that was not mentioned in the post {this can be in words or share a short video with your summary of the video and why you shared it (less than 5 minutes) (your own knowledge)
3 – Integrating your experience in the topic (your own knowledge)
Additional resources https://youtu.be/JDRWGiQnHdE

Choose one person who is identified by name and title in Video 1, “Markets”, in

Choose one person who is identified by name and title in Video 1, “Markets”, in the Economics U$A: 21st Century Edition video series [https://www.learner.org/series/economics-ua-21st-century-edition/markets/]. For that person explain:
What topic in the video program is discussed by the person, and what does the person say about that topic?
Why the person’s statement in the video is important or relevant?
What is the person’s connection, interest, or bias about the topic?
Why did you choose that person?

for the essay for 2 articles i did half a page for both what i want you to do is

for the essay for 2 articles i did half a page for both what i want you to do is complete until it becomes one page for each article
Formatting: One Page Each, one inch margins, single spaced, left justification, essay format, 12 point font, times new roman, Don’t forget to check your formatting, spelling and grammar before you submit your assignment!
Homework part 1 in files
– The (mis)framing of social justice: Why ideologies of depolitization and meritocracy hinder engineers’ ability to think about social injustices’ by Erin Cech: (ITS IN YOUR FILE FOLDER)
• Are technical concerns distinct from social concerns? Does engineering reside purely in a technical domain? (Depoliticization)
• Do you feel that social justice concerns (i.e., understanding the consequences of technology, improving society, etc.) have become less important to you over the course of your academic education?
• What sorts of social complexities do you think may be being ignored in your education at USF?
• How might the ideology of meritocracy effect design decisions within engineering?
• What can be done to combat these ideologies?
part 2
Review Case on Public Health and Safety (details are in the powerpoint)
• Specifically consider Sections II and III of the NSPE Code of Ethics
• What are Engineer A’s obligations under the circumstances?

Question 1: Describe how media marketing has changed from the 1990s (as shown in

Question 1: Describe how media marketing has changed from the 1990s (as shown in ‘Merchants of Cool’) to now (as described in the three videos on social media influencers). What impact do you think these changes have had on popular culture? More specifically, what impact do you think this has had on media content? (100 words min.)
Question 2: In general, what do you think it is about social media influencers and YouTube celebrities that we find so appealing? Do you agree with the argument that we find these people more ‘authentic’ and ‘relatable’? Why or why not? (100 words min.)
Question 3: Give a rough estimate of the number of social media influencers you follow and the YouTube celebrities that you watch on a regular basis. Who are your favourite social media influencers to follow or YouTube celebrities to watch and why? Does the fact that a social media influencer or YouTuber is paid or sponsored change your opinion of them or the content they produce? Explain. If you don’t follow social media influencers or YouTube celebrities, please explain why you don’t. (100 words min.)

Week 3 Discussion Classmate Response Respond to one of your classmates’ posts, t

Week 3 Discussion Classmate Response
Respond to one of your classmates’ posts, the classmate initial post is in the attachments. I have also added this weeks discussion below for your reference.
This discussion will help you develop the skills you need to synthesize several sources together. Here’s what you’ll need to do:
Step #1: Read any three (3) of the five articles listed below on the movie CODA (2021).
Amanda Morris, New York Times Review: “Representation or Stereotype? Deaf Viewers are torn over ‘CODA.'”
Ann Hornaday, Washington Post Review: “The movie ‘CODA’ reminds us that cliches sometimes work–and brilliantly.”
Richard Brody, New York Post Review: “‘CODA’ is a Feel-Bad, Feel-Good Movie.”
Owen Glieberman, Variety Review, “Sian Heder’s Family Drama Kicks Off Sundance on a Note of Enthralling Emotion.”
Tomris Laffly, Ebert Review, “CODA.”
Step #2: Review the worksheet on using a synthesis matrix featured in this week’s Content.
Step #3: Complete a synthesis matrix for the three articles you’ve read. This includes:
Identify at least three (3) main ideas or topics covered by the reviews (e.g., plot, actors, bias, etc.)
Take notes on what the critics write about these main ideas (e.g., “Critic 1 praises the plot as interesting…” and “Critic 2 finds the plot too contrived…”)
Jotting down quotes that support your observations (e.g., “Critic 3 writes, ‘The story has movie-goers at the edge of their seats the whole three hours…”)
Step #4: Identify at least two key issues or questions that are particularly problematic or controversial or striking or worthy of exploring. These would be issues/questions that can be supported by at least two of the articles. They may be points on which the critics agree or disagree, issues that weren’t adequately addressed, or ideas that are explored in the reviews (e.g., “What did the critics think about the actors’ performances?” or “Discussion of bias in the movie’s portrayal of deaf culture”). Ask yourself, what ideas/issues that are shared among the articles might be interesting to pursue further? Using specific quotations and transitional phrases, discuss how the reviewers’ opinions are similar, or different.
Step #5: Explain how these issues are played out in the reviews (1-2 sentences). What are the critics’ positions on these issues? What was stated/not stated? What other questions does this issue introduce? (For example, for “Why didn’t the critics recognize the cinematography?” you might write about how one critic barely mentioned the cinematography, while another stated how it was overrated, focusing more on the acting.) In a paragraph, discuss how reviewers approached topics and themes in the films. You can use specific quotes and cite the reviews in text using APA guidelines.
Note that a sample response to this discussion, based on three reviews of Danny Boyle’s _Steve Jobs_, appears in the Content for this week.

For this assignment, you will watch Dr Martin Luther King’s I Have a Dream speec

For this assignment, you will watch Dr Martin Luther King’s I Have a Dream speech and a speech by Alicia Garza of the Black Lives Matter movement and answer questions listed below. Pay special attention to the following aspects in the two speeches.
Importance of body language while delivering the speech.
Gestures, cadence and delivery style.
Answer the following:
Provide a summary of the two speeches.
Compare Dr. King’s leadership, charisma, power and passion to capture his audience to Alicia Garza’s speech.
What are the similarities, if any? What are the differences, if any?
How does the location of the speeches support their messaging? Dr. King’s speech was held in a church and at the Lincoln Memorial, whereas today we
have social networking and more avenues to relay messages. Does messaging make a difference?
Describe how the audience in Dr. King’s speeches relate to the Alicia Garza’s audience. Do you see a similarity or differences in the speeches and in the audience?
Requirements
Length: 2-3 pages of substantive content
12 pt font
Parenthetical in-text citations included and formatted in APA style
References page (a minimum of 2 outside scholarly sources plus the textbook and/or the weekly lesson for each course outcome.
Title and introduction pages are present.
Grading
This activity will be graded based on the Written Assignment Grading Rubric.
Outcomes
CO 2: Relate the articles of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights to specific issues or cases
Read/review the following resources for this activity:
Textbook: Chapter 7, 8
Lesson 3
APA style manual
Citation and Writing Assistance: Writing Papers
At CU
Library Overview
How to Search for Articles – the Everything Tab
Instructions
Social Movements are only as important as the person leading them.
The person(s) leading a social movement must have charisma and be able to captivate an audience. Political scientists and historians are taught to analvze body language, especially during debates and speeches.