Students will select a public policy or program, then describe how they would propose to evaluate the policy or program by employing the methods, techniques, etc., which are covered in the course.
The attached thesis paper provides the topic of the research paper and the public policy/program that needs to be researched.
Students will select a policy or program to be evaluated, either from the list which follows or one of their own choosing. You may consider a topic that is applicable to your capstone project. All policy/program topics must be approved by the instructor. Then, students will describe how they would plan/propose to evaluate the policy or program by employing the methods, techniques, etc., which are covered in the course. Do not evaluate the policy or program, you are only expected to describe how you would go about evaluating the policy or program. The proposal must be 10-15 typed, double-spaced pages in length with standard one-inch margins all around and 12-point font. Otherwise, general formatting should follow APA style. Cover page and reference pages do not count towards the 10-15-pagerequirement.
Textbook:
Joseph S. Wholey, Harry P. Hatry, and Kathryn E. Newcomer, editors, Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation, Latest Edition. San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass/Wiley Imprint,
below are the revision requested emailed to me by the professor & the methodology portion he stated I reference: Hi, You made some revisions. Nevertheless, a comparative research question is not in place. Your question reads: “do monetary incentives serve as a motivational tool in public organizations?” It should read more like: “Do public organizations that offer employees monetary incentives observe significant employee motivation and work engagement than public organizations that __________ ?(fill in the blank here). You must compare your research premise with another premise. At this time you have a Topic question. At this moment, your Literature Review does not match your research question because you have nothing to compare it with. The theories you listed speak to motivation versus your premise on incentives to motivate employees. The Methodology needs much revision. Please read the Methodology hand-out I emailed which contains methodology samples to collect your data. Please arrange a date and time this week for us to discuss your paper. Thank you.
: Equity design driven policy and program development – Review the key steps to design driven program development. Focus your review of each step in detail and experience through the perspective of a current or future public servant either in the nonprofit or government sector. 1. What were some of the biggest insights and skill knowledge you gained through learning about ECD? Make sure to reflect on constructivist listening and the role of prototyping/testing as a way to determine what kinds of policy and program process you’d implement as a manager and leader in a public organization. . What aspects of each phase worked for you, which ones didn’t? Please review each one. 3. What content would you have liked more time and practice on? You don’t need to cover all phases, we want to know what was most useful and what could be improved in the phases that you found least useful. 4. We discussed how having opportunities to apply this model would have been helpful. What kinds of applications would be most appealing to you? Attached are recording for our ‘experiment’ and some notes. Also the slides from the class, and two equity-design framework guides
: Equity design driven policy and program development – Review the key steps to design driven program development. Focus your review of each step in detail and experience through the perspective of a current or future public servant either in the nonprofit or government sector. 1. What were some of the biggest insights and skill knowledge you gained through learning about ECD? Make sure to reflect on constructivist listening and the role of prototyping/testing as a way to determine what kinds of policy and program process you’d implement as a manager and leader in a public organization. . What aspects of each phase worked for you, which ones didn’t? Please review each one. 3. What content would you have liked more time and practice on? You don’t need to cover all phases, we want to know what was most useful and what could be improved in the phases that you found least useful. 4. We discussed how having opportunities to apply this model would have been helpful. What kinds of applications would be most appealing to you? Attached are slides and recordings for our ‘experiment’ and some notes (recording are on the 1st 3 slides) and two equity-design framework guides
: Equity design driven policy and program development – Review the key steps to design driven program development. Focus your review of each step in detail and experience through the perspective of a current or future public servant either in the nonprofit or government sector. 1. What were some of the biggest insights and skill knowledge you gained through learning about ECD? Make sure to reflect on constructivist listening and the role of prototyping/testing as a way to determine what kinds of policy and program process you’d implement as a manager and leader in a public organization. . What aspects of each phase worked for you, which ones didn’t? Please review each one. 3. What content would you have liked more time and practice on? You don’t need to cover all phases, we want to know what was most useful and what could be improved in the phases that you found least useful. 4. We discussed how having opportunities to apply this model would have been helpful. What kinds of applications would be most appealing to you? Attached are recording for our ‘experiment’ and some notes. Also the slides from the class, and two equity-design framework guides
Assignment Directions: (Your slides need to include keywords, phrases, or brief sentences only! Do not place complete paragraphs on your slides. Use bullets to space out your content; however, do not include more than seven bullets per slide.)
Step One: For this assignment, you will need to create a PowerPoint presentation for a 5-7 minute Informative Speech.
This PowerPoint should include the following items:
Title slide
Three body slides
Conclusion slide
Reference slide
One visual object (e.g., chart, graph, image, etc.).
Step Two: Next, review the below (Rubric), (Tutorial Video for a Speech Outline), and the (Tutorial Video for presentation tips).
Step Three: Begin to create your slides with the use of the speech outline that has been attached.
Rubric
Tutorial Video for Speech Outline.
Tutorial Video for presentation Tips. Go to (The key thing to remember is that your presentation is there to compliment your speech, not be its focus). ”
https://slidemodel.com/23-powerpoint-presentation-tips-creating-engaging-interactive-presentations/#slide1_2
